All Days 2005
DOI: 10.2523/iptc-11038-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Tracer Injection-Test Approach to Reservoir Characterization: Theory and Practice

Abstract: TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractThis paper presents new models and their solutions for the flow of tracers in reservoir, both radioactive and chemical, under constant mass flux conditions, which can be used for the design, evaluation and interpretation of injection test. The models developed consider homogeneous and naturally fractured reservoirs (NFR). For the case of NFR, a transient fracture-matrix tracer transfer is assumed. The models and the solutions acquired include the tracer lost … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tracer assessment provides the variation of the flooding streamline within the heterogeneity formation. This pathline is geologically indistinguishable or opposite under the natural fracturing, fracture systems, fault frontier, great permeability vein, high permeability thief zones, or stream-blockade (Samaniego et al, 2005). Various types of tracer fluid have been added into the injection influx to monitor the streamline as a fluid carrier (Du & Guan, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tracer assessment provides the variation of the flooding streamline within the heterogeneity formation. This pathline is geologically indistinguishable or opposite under the natural fracturing, fracture systems, fault frontier, great permeability vein, high permeability thief zones, or stream-blockade (Samaniego et al, 2005). Various types of tracer fluid have been added into the injection influx to monitor the streamline as a fluid carrier (Du & Guan, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%