2013
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A trade-off between having many sons and shorter maternal post-reproductive survival in pre-industrial Finland

Abstract: A bias in reproduction towards sons, which are energetically more costly than daughters, has been suggested to shorten parental lifespan, but previous results have been mixed. Reproductive costs should be most evident in low rather than high resource settings, and are not expected to be severe in men, because women pay higher direct costs of reproduction. We, therefore, used demographic data from pre-industrial Finland to investigate whether the number of sons and daughters born affected their parents' post-re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only exceptions are investigations in humans, which provide mixed support for the hypothesis that sons reduce maternal post-menopausal lifespan more than daughters (see mini-review in [22]). Furthermore, the differential effects of sons and daughters on post-reproductive lifespan in human mothers may be owing to sociocultural rather than biological mechanisms [23][24][25]. For instance, in several societies, daughters provide more help than sons for elderly parents [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only exceptions are investigations in humans, which provide mixed support for the hypothesis that sons reduce maternal post-menopausal lifespan more than daughters (see mini-review in [22]). Furthermore, the differential effects of sons and daughters on post-reproductive lifespan in human mothers may be owing to sociocultural rather than biological mechanisms [23][24][25]. For instance, in several societies, daughters provide more help than sons for elderly parents [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas historical life history research finds that males exert a higher reproductive cost to the mother than do females (12,13), it remains unclear whether this finding holds in contemporary populations. Sons have greater average birth weight and height (35,36).…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Whereas the mother's first exposure to these antigens may not induce an inflammatory reaction, researchers posit that they may elicit an inflammatory cytokine cascade in the subsequent pregnancy, which may in turn accelerate the timing of parturition, affect fetal growth, or increase the risk of fetal demise (10,11). A second report, based on results from 18 th and 19 th century Finland, contends that males more 4 than females exert a higher cost to the mother in terms of her reduced lifespan and her lower fitness of subsequent offspring (12,13). This heightened maternal load of rearing males may elicit responses that, in turn, elevate the risk of adverse outcomes for the subsequent pregnancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it is predicted that there would be genetic correlations between early and late‐life fitness but these might not always be negative (e.g., Maklakov, Rowe, & Friberg, ) and the unappreciated costs of germ line maintenance challenge the fecundity‐life span trade‐off (Maklakov & Immler, ). Elevated rates of reproduction have been shown to decrease life span in a range of species (Chapman, Liddle, Kalb, Wolfner, & Partridge, ; Helle & Lummaa, ; Maynard Smith, ; Partridge & Farquhar, ; Tatar, Carey, & Vaupel, ). Furthermore, the hypothesized trade‐off between early and late‐life reproduction has been supported by various studies of wild vertebrates (Bouwhuis, Charmantier, Verhulst, & Sheldon, ; Nussey, Kruuk, Donald, Fowlie, & Clutton‐Brock, ; Reed et al, ), likewise the influence of early reproductive effort on late‐life survival and late‐life body condition (Beirne, Delahay, & Young, ; Lemaître et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%