2011 7th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing 2011
DOI: 10.1109/wicom.2011.6040372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Traffic-Aware MAC Protocol Based on Dynamic Contention Windows in Wireless Sensor Networks

Abstract: Wireless sensor networks are formed by a great deal of sensor nodes, which are generally battery-powered and may not be recharged easily. Consequently, how to save energy is an important issue when designing protocol in wireless sensor network. However, lowering the energy consumption may result in higher latency. To address such a tradeoff, this paper proposes a MAC protocol supported dynamic contention window size. Compared with S-MAC using fixed contention window sizes, TrawMAC adaptively adjusts the conten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, these types of protocols are suitable for WSNs. The typical contention-based MAC protocols are S-MAC (Sensor-MAC) , DS-MAC (Dynamic S-MAC), T-MAC (Timeout-MAC) [11], ADV-MAC (ADVertisement) [12], TRAW-MAC (TRaffic AWare MAC) [13], C-MAC (Congestion aware MAC) [14], LD-MAC (Low Delay MAC) [15] [20]. In some of these protocols, authors had considered delay but in high traffic scenario, the delay performance of these protocols is very bad.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, these types of protocols are suitable for WSNs. The typical contention-based MAC protocols are S-MAC (Sensor-MAC) , DS-MAC (Dynamic S-MAC), T-MAC (Timeout-MAC) [11], ADV-MAC (ADVertisement) [12], TRAW-MAC (TRaffic AWare MAC) [13], C-MAC (Congestion aware MAC) [14], LD-MAC (Low Delay MAC) [15] [20]. In some of these protocols, authors had considered delay but in high traffic scenario, the delay performance of these protocols is very bad.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%