2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A trait-based risk assessment of South African forest birds indicates vulnerability of hole-nesting species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected 10 traits that have been associated with birds' susceptibility to heatwaves, and for which data are readily available, but we acknowledge that other traits (e.g., associated with behavioural and physiological responses) may also be important for the assessment of vulnerability. Classifying species based on a few available and/or coarse‐resolution traits may simplify actual vulnerability results (Payne et al., 2023). As such, there is a growing need to incorporate finer‐scale traits into CCVAs (Payne et al., 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We selected 10 traits that have been associated with birds' susceptibility to heatwaves, and for which data are readily available, but we acknowledge that other traits (e.g., associated with behavioural and physiological responses) may also be important for the assessment of vulnerability. Classifying species based on a few available and/or coarse‐resolution traits may simplify actual vulnerability results (Payne et al., 2023). As such, there is a growing need to incorporate finer‐scale traits into CCVAs (Payne et al., 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results of different approaches for the same species may not be consistent because each approach inputs different variables and combines them in different ways (Hossain et al., 2019; Wheatley et al., 2017). In recent years, with growing evidence of a link between species' traits and climate change impacts, and the growing availability of trait databases (Ding et al., 2022; Etard et al., 2020; Jiguet et al., 2006; Pacifici et al., 2017; Tobias et al., 2022), trait‐based CCVAs have commonly been applied to assess species' vulnerability of large numbers of species more rapidly than would be possible with correlative and mechanistic approaches (e.g., Ameca et al., 2018; Foden et al., 2013; Foden & Young, 2016; Pacifici et al., 2015; Payne et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2019). Traits provide valuable insights into the factors influencing species' responses to environmental change by encompassing key aspects of a species' morphology, life‐history, physiology, and behavior, and can inform on species' use of resources and space, as well as on population and community‐level processes (Capdevila et al., 2022; Etard et al., 2022; Newbold et al., 2013; Pacifici et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…comm.). Nonetheless, this study highlights the necessity for further research on the relationships between the Cape Parrot and primary excavating species that make holes which it could modify as nests, particularly in the context of cavity-nesting species being at risk in South African forests on account of a paucity of nesting sites (Cooper et al 2020). We suggest that in future ARUs could be used in a more comprehensive investigation into the impact of harvesting on Cape Parrot and primary cavity excavators’ breeding activity, by determining whether gradients of harvesting intensity within harvested forests, measured either from the ground or using LiDAR, relate to breeding activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be attributed largely to extensive informal harvesting of forest products (Leaver and Cherry 2020a), which affects avian community structure (Leaver et al 2019b), and leads to harvestmediated changes in habitat heterogeneity, negatively affecting forest specialist bird species (Leaver et al 2019a). Cavity-nesting species are particularly vulnerable in South Africa, as shown by Cooper et al (2020) using a trait-based assessment. Specifically, this study found that nesting traits were more important in determining risk than feeding traits for forest birds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study found cavity nesting forest birds to be particularly vulnerable in South Africa, with increased risk more strongly associated with loss of nesting - as opposed to foraging - sites (Cooper et al 2020). Several authors have called for the termination of yellowwood harvesting given the negative impact it stands to have on already limited nest site availability for Cape Parrots (Wirminghaus et al 1999, Downs and Symes 2004, Wilson et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%