2009
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A trans -splicing group I intron and tRNA-hyperediting in the mitochondrial genome of the lycophyte Isoetes engelmannii

Abstract: Plant mitochondrial genomes show much more evolutionary plasticity than those of animals. We analysed the first mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of a lycophyte, the quillwort Isoetes engelmannii, which is separated from seed plants by more than 350 million years of evolution. The Isoetes mtDNA is particularly rich in recombination events, and chloroplast as well as nuclear DNA inserts document the incorporation of foreign sequences already in this most ancestral vascular plant lineage. On the other hand, particularly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
150
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
7
150
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). The rpl2 gene is absent altogether from the mtDNAs of the lycophytes Isoetes engelmannii and Selaginella moellendorffii (Grewe et al 2009;Hecht et al 2011). Alignment of the flanking exon sequences with a wider sequence sampling allowed us to label the tracheophyte rpl2 intron as rpl2i846g2 to indicate the insertion site behind the upstream coding nucleotide of Marchantia polymorpha as a reference, as proposed previously (Dombrovska and Qiu 2004).…”
Section: The Rpl2 Locusmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2). The rpl2 gene is absent altogether from the mtDNAs of the lycophytes Isoetes engelmannii and Selaginella moellendorffii (Grewe et al 2009;Hecht et al 2011). Alignment of the flanking exon sequences with a wider sequence sampling allowed us to label the tracheophyte rpl2 intron as rpl2i846g2 to indicate the insertion site behind the upstream coding nucleotide of Marchantia polymorpha as a reference, as proposed previously (Dombrovska and Qiu 2004).…”
Section: The Rpl2 Locusmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The major hindrance for straightforward assemblies of many vascular plant mitochondrial DNAs is their high recombinational activity, often producing complex mtDNA structures with alternative coexisting gene arrangements, made all the more difficult by the large mitochondrial genome sizes in many cases. The particular complex heavily recombining mtDNAs of some lycophytes are an example for the former (Grewe et al 2009;Hecht et al 2011). The mtDNAs of angiosperms like Amborella trichopoda, the Cucurbitaceae or in the genus Silene, which may easily exceed one or even 10 Mbp, and accordingly the genome sizes of most free-living bacteria, are an example for the latter (Ward et al 1981;Alverson et al 2010Alverson et al , 2011Rodríguez-Moreno et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Outside seed plants, the moss Physcomitrella patens has only 11 edited sites in the mitochondrial genome, and the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha appears to have lost RNA editing altogether (Rü dinger et al 2008(Rü dinger et al , 2009). In contrast, other bryophytes, lycophytes, and ferns exhibit frequent mitochondrial editing (Malek et al 1996;Grewe et al 2009;Li et al 2009), while the only two nonseed plant chloroplast genomes examined (from one hornwort and one fern) also have high levels of editing (Kugita et al 2003;Wolf et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Accordingly, neutral and nonadaptive models for the proliferation of RNA editing have also been proposed Fiebig et al 2004;Lynch et al 2006). C-to-U RNA editing appears to have evolved in a recent common ancestor of land plants, but the frequency of editing varies dramatically across lineages and between genomes (Turmel et al 2003;Salone et al 2007;Grewe et al 2009). Seed plants experience relatively frequent editing in mitochondrial genes with $400 sites per species (.1% of all coding sequence) in the few angiosperms examined so far (e.g., Giege and Brennicke 1999) and even higher rates inferred in gymnosperms (Lu et al 1998;Chaw et al 2008;Ran et al 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%