1985
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(85)90222-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A transmission electron microscope study of iron phosphide precipitates in InP crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(a) Synthesis and Characterization. The XRD pattern of FeP is depicted Figure a and reveals sharp Bragg peaks, indicative of a highly crystalline sample, which could all be indexed on the basis of an orthorhombic cell with lattice parameters similar to those reported in the literature ( a = 5.193(1) Å, b = 3.099(1) Å, c = 5.792(1) Å, Pnma ). , Within the FeP unit cell, Fe is coordinated by six P atoms in a nearly hexagonal configuration with Fe−P distances between 2.186 and 2.447 Å. Some Fe−P distances are smaller than the sum of the covalent radii (1.17 Å) and suggest a high degree of covalence for these bonds, in agreement with previous experimental and theoretical analyses of chemical bonding in transition metal phosphides. , The structure can be viewed (inset of Figure a) as a closely packed FeP 6 edge- and face-sharing structure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…(a) Synthesis and Characterization. The XRD pattern of FeP is depicted Figure a and reveals sharp Bragg peaks, indicative of a highly crystalline sample, which could all be indexed on the basis of an orthorhombic cell with lattice parameters similar to those reported in the literature ( a = 5.193(1) Å, b = 3.099(1) Å, c = 5.792(1) Å, Pnma ). , Within the FeP unit cell, Fe is coordinated by six P atoms in a nearly hexagonal configuration with Fe−P distances between 2.186 and 2.447 Å. Some Fe−P distances are smaller than the sum of the covalent radii (1.17 Å) and suggest a high degree of covalence for these bonds, in agreement with previous experimental and theoretical analyses of chemical bonding in transition metal phosphides. , The structure can be viewed (inset of Figure a) as a closely packed FeP 6 edge- and face-sharing structure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…FEM MRO structure analysis of FeNiP. Normalized variance V ( k ) profiles calculated from sets of NBDPs measured on Fe‐ and Ni‐rich areas of the layered nanorod are compared to literature values (vertical lines) from a) FEM studies a [ 45 ] ) or simulated variance curves of NiP b [ 46 ] ), diffraction data of FeNi c [ 47 ] ), and TEM studies of FeP d [ 48 ] ,e [ 49 ] ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 45 ] And peaks at 3.6, 3.9, and 5.2 nm −1 are found in studies on calculated or experimental diffraction data of FeP. [ 48,49 ] The remaining peaks at 4.8, 5.6, and 7.9 nm −1 are assigned to diffraction data of FeNi. [ 47 ] Qualitatively, the two variance profiles show some peaks at the same position, which means that the proposed assignments to distinct clusters are valid for both Ni‐ and Fe‐rich areas but might differ in size or quantity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations