2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.05.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A transmission electron microscopy study of crack formation and propagation in electrochemically cycled graphite electrode in lithium-ion cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Microstructural damage has been observed directly in numerous electrode materials subjected to electrochemical cycling, both within single crystals (or grains) and among polycrystalline aggregates. 4,5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] While the relationships among electrode microstructure, electrochemical cycling conditions, crystallographic changes in the active materials, and resulting mechanical stresses have been elucidated, relatively little is known about the composition-dependency of the key physical properties. Numerous models have been developed to predict mechanical deformation in ion-storage materials during electrochemical cycling, as recently reviewed by Mukhopadhyay and Sheldon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Microstructural damage has been observed directly in numerous electrode materials subjected to electrochemical cycling, both within single crystals (or grains) and among polycrystalline aggregates. 4,5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] While the relationships among electrode microstructure, electrochemical cycling conditions, crystallographic changes in the active materials, and resulting mechanical stresses have been elucidated, relatively little is known about the composition-dependency of the key physical properties. Numerous models have been developed to predict mechanical deformation in ion-storage materials during electrochemical cycling, as recently reviewed by Mukhopadhyay and Sheldon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This damage feature is consistent with those reported in the literature for carbon electrodes. [11,12,[51][52][53] It is likely that most damage to the uncoated CFs occurred prior to the establishment of the solid electrolyte layer. [7,8] …”
Section: Microstructural and Compositional Characterization Of Sn-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At high scan rates (>3.00 mV s À1 ), delamination of graphite layers by the formation and propagation of interlayer cracks adjacent to SEI/graphite interfaces occurred due to the diffusion of co-intercalation products (Li 2 CO 3 , LiC 6 ) at the crack tips during the subsequent cycles. [12] Electrode surface modification is a common focus of the attempts made in order to improve the electrochemical performance. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] For example, heating Li-ion cells containing graphite electrodes at 333 K (60°C) in an EC-based electrolyte was found to generate a Li 2 CO 3 -enriched SEI on graphite surface, which in turn ensued a 28 pct increase in the battery capacity when subsequently tested at 298 K (25°C).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lithium intercalation in between the graphene layers leads to the formation of LiC 6 , which results in a low theoretical capacity of graphite that is 372 mA h g −1 . Although graphite anodes provide good life cycle performance and high coulombic efficiency [2,3], they suffer from severe damage in the first cycle due to lithiation and solvent co-intercalation that leads to a drastic drop in the specific capacity [4,5]. Once a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) is formed on the electrode surfaces, solvent co-intercalation and, hence, damage is reduced [4,6] depending on the morphology and uniformity of the SEI [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%