2016 12th IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation (ICCA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icca.2016.7505322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A transparent bilateral control scheme for a local teleoperation system using proportional-delayed controllers

Abstract: This paper addresses the closed-loop stability analysis problem of a bilateral local teleoperation system in the presence of delays, with the purpose of maintaining a kinematic correspondence between a master and a slave device. The stability analysis is proposed as a general analysis in the controller's parameter-space under the assumption of two fixed delays, considering one due to the signal and communication processing and one defined as a design delay for the controller. Furthermore, a method for measurin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“… P M and P S are the mechanical admittances of the master and the slave device, respectively: furthermore, a similar notation is used for the controllers C M and C S and the angular positions Θ M and Θ S . This scheme is a variation presented by Hernández-Díez et al 31 of the one used by Liacu et al 27 for haptic-virtual systems. However, instead of using a P δ controller, a fractional P D μ controller is implemented and compared with a classical PD controller.…”
Section: Numerical and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… P M and P S are the mechanical admittances of the master and the slave device, respectively: furthermore, a similar notation is used for the controllers C M and C S and the angular positions Θ M and Θ S . This scheme is a variation presented by Hernández-Díez et al 31 of the one used by Liacu et al 27 for haptic-virtual systems. However, instead of using a P δ controller, a fractional P D μ controller is implemented and compared with a classical PD controller.…”
Section: Numerical and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Hernández-Díez et al, 31 the characteristic equation of the closed-loop system can be written as follows…”
Section: Numerical and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, as seen in the experimental results section, to decrease the number of sensors needed for the implementation to only one voltage sensor. Second, as mentioned in [12] and references therein, to reduce the processing effort in the application of such controller in comparison to one of PID type. This is due to the fact that delaying a signal is numerically simpler than derivating it, in which some numerical procedure or algorithm is required.…”
Section: References Number Of Sensors In the Control Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear to see, that a solution of the partial differential equation (12) can be easily computed by assuming a solution ϕ satisfying:…”
Section: B Zero Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet another study elaborated the closed-loop stability analysis of voltage buck using proportional-delayed controller [17] that the is also based on the geometric approach, which allows partitioning the parameters space into regions with a constant number of unstable roots. In the work of Diez et al, a transparent bilateral control scheme for a local teleoperation system was realized by using a proportional-delayed controller [19]. Fragility analysis, which is based on computing of the maximum controller parameters deviation without losing the closed-loop stability, was carefully elaborated.…”
Section: A Review Of Favourable Effects Of Delay In Control Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%