2017
DOI: 10.1002/mop.30638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tri‐band monopole filtering antenna using multimode resonators

Abstract: A simple tri‐band monopole filtering antenna using multimode resonators is proposed. Two novel microstrip open‐loop multimode resonators and a monopole ring antenna with an open stub are integrated together on the same layer of the substrate. Compared with the traditional monopole antenna, the integration makes the proposed antenna operate at 2.4/5.2/6.5 GHz and realize two radiation zeroes at 2 and 3.3 GHz. It leads to the high selectivity for 2.4 GHz. The measured results, including the reflection coefficien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance including size, peak gain and frequency band of the presented filtering antenna in this paper together with several other published filtering antennas reported in the references are summarized in Table 1 (where λ g is the waveguide wavelength of these filtering antennas at the central frequency of the lowest operating frequency band). Compared with the antennas in [5,10,11], the proposed antenna is obviously compact. Besides, its higher band is controllable easily by adjusting the dimension of the T-shaped stub while leaving the lower band unaffected, which reduces the complexity of the design process.…”
Section: Design Of Compact Dual Band Filtering Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The performance including size, peak gain and frequency band of the presented filtering antenna in this paper together with several other published filtering antennas reported in the references are summarized in Table 1 (where λ g is the waveguide wavelength of these filtering antennas at the central frequency of the lowest operating frequency band). Compared with the antennas in [5,10,11], the proposed antenna is obviously compact. Besides, its higher band is controllable easily by adjusting the dimension of the T-shaped stub while leaving the lower band unaffected, which reduces the complexity of the design process.…”
Section: Design Of Compact Dual Band Filtering Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation is caused by the need of a quarter-wavelength coupled line which is treated as the admittance inverter. In [10], a multiband filter and monopole antenna are cascaded directly to realize a tri-band filtering antenna without a fully integrated process while its size is large. A compact dual-band filtering patch antenna using step impedance resonators with harmonic suppression and controllable bandwidth is reported in [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem and realize the integration, a variety of antennas with filtering performance have been reported. For the integrated filtering antenna designs in [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], the radiator acts as the last resonator of the narrow-band filtering circuit, which complicates the antenna structure. Meanwhile, adding complex filtering circuits can result in extra insertion loss and degrade the gain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, filtering antennas have achieved more concentration where in an antenna adds up to filtering performance and is reported in References . The filtering characteristics have been obtained mostly by etching or modifying the feed line, resulting in more spurious radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few multiband filtering antennas have been reported which used techniques such as connecting stubs to the feed line, placing parasitic element near the radiating element, using impedance or multimode resonators to achieve filtering performance. Furthermore, at higher frequencies, the filtering antennas suffer from the drawback of circuit complexity, resulting in greater insertion loss and larger size …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%