2013
DOI: 10.1007/s40318-013-0006-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tricky European fixture: an assessment of UEFA’s Financial Fair Play regulations and their compatibility with EU law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though there have been debates about the compatibility of FFP regulations with EU laws (Flanagan, 2013), the regulations are implemented and since European football clubs' competitive power mostly depends on their spending, the most decisive element of the FFP has been break-even. In the 2017/2018 season, some of the non-Big 5 major leagues such as Portugal, Russia and Turkey had a wage-to-revenue ratio higher than 70% which is the industry marker for club financial health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though there have been debates about the compatibility of FFP regulations with EU laws (Flanagan, 2013), the regulations are implemented and since European football clubs' competitive power mostly depends on their spending, the most decisive element of the FFP has been break-even. In the 2017/2018 season, some of the non-Big 5 major leagues such as Portugal, Russia and Turkey had a wage-to-revenue ratio higher than 70% which is the industry marker for club financial health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than the two being discrete, the success of FFP, which has helped foster an environment in European football whereby there have been significant reductions in financial losses, significant reductions in overdue payables, and revenue growth outpacing wage growth for first time since UEFA started collecting and analysing pan-European data (UEFA 2014), should inform the residual debate around the FCR. FFP is not without its own attendant legal challenges (Flanagan 2013), but the evidence suggests it is having a positive impact on financial stability (UEFA 2014). FFP also represents a more pro-active, ex ante, approach to solvency in comparison to the ex post FCR approach.…”
Section: The Financial Fair Play Eramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 See UEFA (2015a). For analysis of the FFP Regulations see Long (2012); Flanagan (2013); Lindholm (2010); Petit (2014); Vopel (2013); Serby (2014b); Bastianon (2015). 12 Weatherill (2013); lawyer Jean-Louis Dupont, who acted for Bosman, brought a complaint to both the EC and the Brussels Court of First Instance on behalf of players' agent Striani stating that the 'break-even' rule generates the following restrictions of competition; restriction of investment; fossilisation of existing market structure; a reduction in the number of transfers; deflationary effect on players' wages and hence also agents' fees; see Dupont (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…78 UEFA's statutes at Article 61 give jurisdiction to CAS to arbitrate on disputes between UEFA and clubs, players and leagues and associations 'to the exclusion of any ordinary court'. Swiss club FC Sion's jurisdictional challenge led to threats from FIFA to expel Switzerland from international football; see further Flanagan (2013). 79 see UEFA (2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation