2021
DOI: 10.3389/frwa.2021.693172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Triple Collocation-Based Comparison of Three L-Band Soil Moisture Datasets, SMAP, SMOS-IC, and SMOS, Over Varied Climates and Land Covers

Abstract: Soil moisture plays an important role in the hydrologic water cycle. Relative to in-situ soil moisture measurements, remote sensing has been the only means of monitoring global scale soil moisture in near real-time over the past 40 years. Among these, soil moisture products from radiometry sensors operating at L-band, e.g., SMAP, SMOS, and SMOS-IC, are theoretically established to be more advantageous than previous C/X-band products. However, little effort has been made to investigate the inter-product differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An investigation whether the fast changing surface signals can also be detected in the GRACE data will be pursued in Section 4.3 for high-pass filtered time series. In a comparison of the three SSM products, SMAP L3 and the multi-satellite combination product ESA CCI time series appear less noisy than the SMOS L3 time series, which is in good agreement with findings of, e.g., Montzka et al (2017), Cui et al (2017), Xu and Frey (2021) and Kim et al (2021).…”
Section: Time Series Comparison For An Example Locationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…An investigation whether the fast changing surface signals can also be detected in the GRACE data will be pursued in Section 4.3 for high-pass filtered time series. In a comparison of the three SSM products, SMAP L3 and the multi-satellite combination product ESA CCI time series appear less noisy than the SMOS L3 time series, which is in good agreement with findings of, e.g., Montzka et al (2017), Cui et al (2017), Xu and Frey (2021) and Kim et al (2021).…”
Section: Time Series Comparison For An Example Locationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, all the data exhibit relatively low SD TC and R TC values over northern Africa and the Arabian Peninsula with barren land covers and arid/semi-arid climates. The reasons given for this discrepancy can be concluded: i) The radiometer/radar has a challenge in receiving the relevant signals over extremely dry environments [30,52]. ii) The SM retrievals are derived from deeper soil layers due to the lower frequency microwave bands penetrating deeper in dry soil layers [53,54].…”
Section: ) Tc-based Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative to the other land cover types, despite all the products with lower SD TC values, the performance of R TC degraded over the barren lands. Previous validation works [52,56] also indicated that satellite-based products have difficulty in capturing the temporal SM variations over barren areas. This discrepancy also appears in the subsequent in-situ validations in barren lands.…”
Section: ) Comparisons Over Different Land Cover Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data can provide the spectral information of the soil surface related to the SM and have a finer spatial resolution than CYGNSS and passive remote sensing SM products (Babaeian et al, 2018 ). Some recent studies have proposed different multi-source remote sensing fusion methods for SM spatial reconstruction, e.g., Kalman filtering, triple collocation, random forest, and back-propagation (BP) neural network (Xu et al, 2018 ; Fu et al, 2019 ; Long et al, 2019 ; Kim et al, 2021 ; Wu et al, 2021 ). Nevertheless, it should be noted that the existing algorithms mostly ignore the missing data caused by the influence of the cloud on the optical remote sensing data, which lead to the discontinuity of the fusion result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%