2013 8th International Conference on Computer Engineering &Amp; Systems (ICCES) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icces.2013.6707167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A trust management system for ad-hoc mobile clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The familiarity value represents a node's familiar degree with another individual node and is used to calculate the weighting factor that determines how much the node recommendation opinion impacts on the reputation computation result. Hammam et al [18] proposed a trust management system (TMC) for mobile ad-hoc clouds to verify that participants are reliable, available, and not malicious. The TMC considered availability, neighbors' evaluation and response quality, and task completeness and calculated the reputation trust value for nodes through EigenTrust algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The familiarity value represents a node's familiar degree with another individual node and is used to calculate the weighting factor that determines how much the node recommendation opinion impacts on the reputation computation result. Hammam et al [18] proposed a trust management system (TMC) for mobile ad-hoc clouds to verify that participants are reliable, available, and not malicious. The TMC considered availability, neighbors' evaluation and response quality, and task completeness and calculated the reputation trust value for nodes through EigenTrust algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TMC is a server‐based trust model for D2D context. When an IoT device requires to offload a service, it sends a request to the central server specifying its preferences.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To bypass the latter issues, one of the existing works considered a guarantor node with which recommendations are compared, while the selection of a confident guarantor node is a complex issue and may lead to very poor trust performance if a lying node is falsely selected to play this role. Since it is not obvious to distinguish determinately between honest and dishonest recommendations, some other works weight recommendations based on the trust level of their recommenders . However, highly trusted nodes are not guaranteed to send honest recommendations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [15] presented a reputation mechanism to recognize selfish nodes much earlier and reduce the convergence time for isolating selfish nodes by combining familiarity values with subjective opinions. Hammam et al [8] proposed a trust management system (TMC) for mobile ad-hoc clouds to verify that participants are reliable, available, and harmless. The TMC considered availability, neighbors' evaluation and response quality, and task completeness; it also calculated the reputation trust value for nodes.…”
Section: MCCmentioning
confidence: 99%