1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf02108668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A trust region method for implicit orthogonal distance regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to bypass the difficulties, diverse approximating measures (including the normalized algebraic distance (1.8)) of the geometric distance have been used particularly for applications in computer/machine vision [26], [32], [48], [51], [53], [67], [73]. Due to the fact that the performance gap between algebraic fitting and geometric fitting is wide and unable to be bridged using the approximating measures of the geometric distance, many research efforts have been made to develop geometric fitting algorithms (see the next section for a review [20], [25], [34], [44], [45], [61], [74], [75], [87]). …”
Section: Algebraic Fitting Vs Geometric Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to bypass the difficulties, diverse approximating measures (including the normalized algebraic distance (1.8)) of the geometric distance have been used particularly for applications in computer/machine vision [26], [32], [48], [51], [53], [67], [73]. Due to the fact that the performance gap between algebraic fitting and geometric fitting is wide and unable to be bridged using the approximating measures of the geometric distance, many research efforts have been made to develop geometric fitting algorithms (see the next section for a review [20], [25], [34], [44], [45], [61], [74], [75], [87]). …”
Section: Algebraic Fitting Vs Geometric Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ODF problem of any other curve/surface than a line/plane is a nonlinear least-squares problem which should thus be solved using iteration. Although there are a few dedicated ODF algorithms for relatively simple model features such as circles/spheres and ellipses [34], [87], in this section the general ODF algorithms for explicit [20], implicit [44], [75], and parametric [25], [45], [74] curves and surfaces are reviewed ( [21]. Since then, their algorithm has been chosen as the standard ODF algorithm for many applications, despite the limited usability of the explicit features as mentioned in Sect.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Orthogonal Distance Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with Sullivan et al's algorithm [39], our algorithm, including (24) and (27), simultaneously estimates the parameters a in terms of form, position, and rotation parameters. And, Sullivan et al's algorithm obtains its Jacobian matrix unnecessarily expensively from (2).…”
Section: Pumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And, as we will show in Section 3.1, they have unnecessarily expensively obtained the partial derivatives @db; X i =@b from (2). Helfrich and Zwick described a similar algorithm in [27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fitting of curves and surfaces, orthogonal distance fitting is of primary concern because of the applied error definition, namely the shortest distance from the given point to the model feature [5,9]. While there are orthogonal distance fitting algorithms for explicit [3], and implicit models [2,7] in the literature, we are considering in this paper fitting algorithms for parametric models [4,6,8,10,11] (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%