2020 2nd Conference on Blockchain Research &Amp; Applications for Innovative Networks and Services (BRAINS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/brains49436.2020.9223272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Truth-Inducing Sybil Resistant Decentralized Blockchain Oracle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the extraction of information in the blockchain context is among the issues to which researchers are trying to find solutions to improve supply chain management. Among these solutions, we quote the contribution of [10], which suggests a protocol based on peer prediction with a non-linear scaling system for decentralized oracles to help confidently retrieve external information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the extraction of information in the blockchain context is among the issues to which researchers are trying to find solutions to improve supply chain management. Among these solutions, we quote the contribution of [10], which suggests a protocol based on peer prediction with a non-linear scaling system for decentralized oracles to help confidently retrieve external information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aggregator gets compensated for the transaction costs, receives an aggregation reward, and additionally has the chance to win the validation reward with a certain probability. The probability is scaled super-linearly based on the deposited stake to encourage the creation of only one identity [20]. If the aggregator is not lucky and does not win the validation reward, the reward is maintained by the oracle contract until an aggregator gets lucky enough to win the accumulated validation rewards.…”
Section: F Incentive Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, it is the general consensus in the community that Blockchain and DLT systems cannot make calls to external systems/oracles [7,4,11,10,17,15,5,6,18,1,13,12,23,14].…”
Section: The Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not ideal as it limits parties: (i) to those that are willing to interact and integrate with the specific smart contract/network and bear any costs required to initiate transactions; or (ii) by requiring dApps to make use of external services which become trusted parties themselves. Chainlink [7] is such a trusted party which makes use of decentralised nodes to lower trust issues in single node operators as well as provides a bridge between various data sources and blockchain systems -yet it requires fees to be paid for providing the service 4 .…”
Section: The Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%