2017
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tug of war: antagonistic effective connectivity patterns over the motor cortex and the severity of motor symptoms in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome

Abstract: We tested the hypothesis that Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS) is characterized by perturbed connectivity within cortico-subcortical motor networks. To this end, we performed a dynamic causal modelling (DCM) analysis of fMRI data collected during a finger opposition task in 24 normal controls and 24 GTS patients. The DCM analysis allowed us to assess whether any GTS-specific patterns of brain activity were related to intrinsic and/or to task-dependent connectivity. While no abnormalities were found for tas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We predicted that participants with Tourette syndrome show similar patterns of anatomical engagement to controls, in line with the hypothesis that tic suppression uses the same core circuitry for stopping and withholding of (non-tic) movements (Rae et al, 2019). Moreover, we predicted that prefrontal and motor control sites would be hyperactive in Tourette syndrome, against the backdrop of basal ganglia dysfunction and elevated primary motor cortex reactivity Zapparoli et al, 2017b). Lastly, we predicted that the strength of interaction between prefrontal and cortical motor planning regions (notably IFG and pre-SMA) with basal ganglia nuclei would determine the severity of Tourette syndrome symptoms (Thomalla et al, 2014;Zapparoli et al, 2017b;Rae et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We predicted that participants with Tourette syndrome show similar patterns of anatomical engagement to controls, in line with the hypothesis that tic suppression uses the same core circuitry for stopping and withholding of (non-tic) movements (Rae et al, 2019). Moreover, we predicted that prefrontal and motor control sites would be hyperactive in Tourette syndrome, against the backdrop of basal ganglia dysfunction and elevated primary motor cortex reactivity Zapparoli et al, 2017b). Lastly, we predicted that the strength of interaction between prefrontal and cortical motor planning regions (notably IFG and pre-SMA) with basal ganglia nuclei would determine the severity of Tourette syndrome symptoms (Thomalla et al, 2014;Zapparoli et al, 2017b;Rae et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Moreover, we predicted that prefrontal and motor control sites would be hyperactive in Tourette syndrome, against the backdrop of basal ganglia dysfunction and elevated primary motor cortex reactivity Zapparoli et al, 2017b). Lastly, we predicted that the strength of interaction between prefrontal and cortical motor planning regions (notably IFG and pre-SMA) with basal ganglia nuclei would determine the severity of Tourette syndrome symptoms (Thomalla et al, 2014;Zapparoli et al, 2017b;Rae et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, the abnormal rhythm recorded over the contralateral motor cortex during the execution of a voluntary movement cannot be considered as a result of tic suppression processes, since it returns to be normal during tic suppression. An alternative hypothesis might derive by taking into account a recent dynamic causal modelling analysis on fMRI data collected on GTS patients (Zapparoli et al, 2017b): here the authors found a pattern of perturbed intrinsic connectivity patterns in the motor networks of GTS patients, with two competing forces operating in a tug of war-like mechanism: aberrant subcortical afferents to M1, compensated for by inputs from the premotor cortex recruited during the execution of a voluntary motor task (Zapparoli et al, 2017b). This top-down control operated by premotor cortices would override the abnormal subcortical inputs, thus guaranteeing adequate behavioural performance (see also Heise et al, 2010).…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tic severity has previously been found to correlate with M1 structural and functional connectivity, highlighting a relationship between symptom expression and the integrity of this area. 43 , 44 Varying developmental time courses in the plasticity of GABAergic interneurons within M1 may underpin this observation. 45 , 46 We also observed an association between premonitory sensation severity and the similarity of representations within the caudate nucleus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%