2015 European Control Conference (ECC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ecc.2015.7330727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tutorial on model predictive control for spacecraft rendezvous

Abstract: This tutorial paper provides a review of recent advances in the field of spacecraft rendezvous using model predictive control (MPC), an advanced optimal control strategy based on on-line constrained optimisation of control inputs based on predictions of future trajectories. Firstly, the rendezvous objectives, and the generic constrained MPC problem formulation are summarised. This is followed by a discussion of how to select the three key ingredients used in an MPC design: the prediction model, the constraints… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Goal of the translational control is to drive the chaser to the docking position, where the target is located, while guaranteeing the satisfaction of the typical position and velocity constraints applied to the proximity maneuver. It is important to precise that the x-y coordinate system of the testbed "coincides" with the x-z orbital plane of (22). In particular, the trajectories should lie in a desired approach cone (see Figure 4), i.e.…”
Section: B Model Of the Planar Experimental Testbedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Goal of the translational control is to drive the chaser to the docking position, where the target is located, while guaranteeing the satisfaction of the typical position and velocity constraints applied to the proximity maneuver. It is important to precise that the x-y coordinate system of the testbed "coincides" with the x-z orbital plane of (22). In particular, the trajectories should lie in a desired approach cone (see Figure 4), i.e.…”
Section: B Model Of the Planar Experimental Testbedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Line-Of-Sight constraint defined in terms of infeasible/feasible region considering a minus V-bar approach[22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weiss while optimizing a user defined cost function based on a predictive model for the system dynamics. The ability to explicitly handle multivariable systems, constraints, and performance objectives has rendered MPC very attractive in various fields such as automotive, factory automation, and spacecraft control [3], [4], where it has been proposed for orbital rendezvous [5]- [7], attitude control [8], formation flight [9], and interplanetary transfer [10]. Even though MPC requires higher computational load than conventional closedloop controllers (e.g., PID), linear-quadratic MPC results in quadratic programs that can be solved quickly and efficiently in resource constrained hardware by compact and easyto-verify algorithms, see, e.g., [11] and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rendezvous guidance and control under impulsive assumption leads to a venue of works since the beginning of the century (see the review papers [3], [4] control frameworks, Model Predictive Control (MPC) has been the most popular one because it ensures stability while minimizing a flexible objective function (the cost) and satisfying technological constraints (thrusters saturation, safe path constraints, etc.). For instance, different safety requirements have been addressed such as visibility constraints [5], collision or plume avoidance [6], [7], or hovering [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%