2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tutorial on the balanced minimum evolution problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
(287 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distance methods constitute a well-consolidated theoretical and algorithmic framework to carry out practical phylogenetic analyses. These methods are typically based on hypotheses and assumptions that are considerably simpler than those at the core of more sophisticated estimation methods, such as Maximum Likelihood (ML) or Bayesian Inference (BI), and this fact can make them poor at modelling complex evolutionary processes ( Schwartz 2019 , Catanzaro et al 2022 ). However, off-the-shelf distance methods can run with almost any kind of data for which a dissimilarity measure is available and are computationally less demanding than more sophisticated estimation methods based on ML and BI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Distance methods constitute a well-consolidated theoretical and algorithmic framework to carry out practical phylogenetic analyses. These methods are typically based on hypotheses and assumptions that are considerably simpler than those at the core of more sophisticated estimation methods, such as Maximum Likelihood (ML) or Bayesian Inference (BI), and this fact can make them poor at modelling complex evolutionary processes ( Schwartz 2019 , Catanzaro et al 2022 ). However, off-the-shelf distance methods can run with almost any kind of data for which a dissimilarity measure is available and are computationally less demanding than more sophisticated estimation methods based on ML and BI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BMEP, recently reviewed in Catanzaro et al (2022) , is -hard and inapproximable within a -factor, for some positive constant , unless ( Fiorini and Joret 2012 ). The BMEP is instead polynomially solvable if the input distance matrix is additive ( Gascuel 2005 ), i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%