2011
DOI: 10.1134/s1995425511070022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A twenty year retrospective on the forest carbon dynamics in Russia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Broadleaf and mixed forests have lower stand-replacement fire rates according to our data. The logging area in Russia increased during the last decade from 0.6 to 1 Mha (Zamolodchikov et al 2011). Our data does not show a statistically significant trend of annual stand-replacement fire during the same time interval.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Broadleaf and mixed forests have lower stand-replacement fire rates according to our data. The logging area in Russia increased during the last decade from 0.6 to 1 Mha (Zamolodchikov et al 2011). Our data does not show a statistically significant trend of annual stand-replacement fire during the same time interval.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The steepest ABC decline is observed during 2002-2005 over the Americas, most likely caused (Fig. 3b), particularly in Russia (+0.10 PgC yr −1 ) owing to regrowth on abandoned state farmland 19 and in China (+0.07 PgC yr −1 ) resulting from afforestation programmes 20 (see Supplementary Fig. 8).…”
Section: Abc Changes In Space and Timementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The spontaneous withdrawal of croplands in the early 1990s provided the additional C sink that could annually compensate about 36 and 49% of the current (level of 2010) fossil fuel emissions in Russia and Kazakhstan (http://www.iea.org), respectively. This extra C sink is equivalent to~30% of the annual C sink in all Russian forests (Zamolodchikov et al, 2011) and could cover about 18% of the global CO 2 release due to deforestation and other land use changes (Pan et al, 2011).…”
Section: Estimation Of Carbon Budget For Russian Federation and Kazakmentioning
confidence: 99%