2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-centre study on facial morphology in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate at nine years of age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
8
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Americleft study also found variable soft tissue midface retrusion with the least favourable profile (centre B) similar to our study . The CBCLP soft tissue a′‐n′‐b′ was considerably more retrusive than found by Bartzela et al (2011) …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Americleft study also found variable soft tissue midface retrusion with the least favourable profile (centre B) similar to our study . The CBCLP soft tissue a′‐n′‐b′ was considerably more retrusive than found by Bartzela et al (2011) …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The mean CUCLP SNA was similar to all Eurocleft and Americleft centres . The mean CBCLP SNA was similar to that of an earlier NZ study involving NZ Europeans but less than that reported in a recent two centre (Gotherburg/Nijmegen) CBCLP study …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[6][7][8] It appears that the scarring produced by the primary surgical repair is a major etiologic factor for the maxillary deficiency. 9 A favorable facial morphology is a key aspect of treatment outcome in patients affected by CLP, 10 and the role of orthodontists for these patients' treatment is substantial, particularly in the improvement of their facial esthetics and dental occlusion. 11 In the literature, several studies have assessed the hard-tissue and soft-tissue morphologies of patients affected by unilateral CLP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it is not possible to archive craniofacial surface morphology. Also used for decades are two dimensional (2D) x-ray cephalometry [7][9] and photography [3], [10] and even today these are the most commonly used records for dento-skeletal and facial diagnosis. The advantages of these 2D imaging techniques are rapid acquisition, archival capabilities and low cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%