2022
DOI: 10.3138/jammi-2022-0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-day workshop reviewing Canadian provincial and national HIV care cascade indicators, reporting, challenges, and recommendations

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The HIV care cascade is an indicators-framework used to assess achievement of HIV clinical targets including HIV diagnosis, HIV care initiation and retention, initiation of antiretroviral therapy, and attainment of viral suppression for people living with HIV. METHODS: The HIV Care Cascade Research Development Team at the CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network Clinical Care and Management Core hosted a two-day virtual workshop to present HIV care cascade data collected nationally from local and provincia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2022, the HIV Care Cascade Research Development Team at the CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network Clinical Care and Management Core Canada collaborated to present HIV care cascade data from local and provincial clinical settings and national cohort studies. However, the findings were limited by the inconsistent HIV care cascade indicator definitions used across different provinces and the variability between the use of nested UNAIDS's 90-90-90 targets and HIV care cascade indicators [11]. This highlights the need for a standard and globally accepted definition of retention [9,[12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In 2022, the HIV Care Cascade Research Development Team at the CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network Clinical Care and Management Core Canada collaborated to present HIV care cascade data from local and provincial clinical settings and national cohort studies. However, the findings were limited by the inconsistent HIV care cascade indicator definitions used across different provinces and the variability between the use of nested UNAIDS's 90-90-90 targets and HIV care cascade indicators [11]. This highlights the need for a standard and globally accepted definition of retention [9,[12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%