1998
DOI: 10.1149/1.1838844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Two‐Dimensional Model of Chemical Vapor Infiltration with Radio‐Frequency Heating: II. Strategies to Achieve Complete Densification

Abstract: A two-dimensional finite-element model is used to compare isothermal and radio-frequency-assisted chemical vapor infiltration of long cylindrical carbon preforms. Densification with radio-frequency heating at a constant input power initially occurs radially around the central zone and then axially toward the ends of the preform. This densification pattern results in significant entrapment of porosity at the center of the preform and requires a relatively long time for completion. A novel scheme for improved ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Processing with ion-ion plasmas at the late afterglow offers unique possibilities. Preliminary calculations (which included the Poisson equation and resolved the sheaths) show that application of a radio-frequency bias results in bombardment of the walls by positive and negative ions alternately [20]. As demonstrated experimentally by Ahn et al [2], this has significant potential to reduce charging and notching effects associated with conventional CW electron-ion plasma processing.…”
Section: Late Afterglow (75-100 µS)mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Processing with ion-ion plasmas at the late afterglow offers unique possibilities. Preliminary calculations (which included the Poisson equation and resolved the sheaths) show that application of a radio-frequency bias results in bombardment of the walls by positive and negative ions alternately [20]. As demonstrated experimentally by Ahn et al [2], this has significant potential to reduce charging and notching effects associated with conventional CW electron-ion plasma processing.…”
Section: Late Afterglow (75-100 µS)mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Calculations were also performed by solving the energy and continuity equations (equations ( 1)-( 4)) along with Poisson equation ((equation ( 5)) for the electrostatic fields resolving the sharp gradients in the very thin sheath region [20]. In the afterglow, the electrostatic fields in the sheath region collapsed abruptly (several orders of magnitude within a few microseconds) after the bulk electrostatic fields collapsed due to the drop in electron temperature and the decay of electron density.…”
Section: Electrostatic Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider solving N nonlinear equations in N state variables u, dependent on a set of m parameters p F(u, p) ϭ 0 u⑀R N , p⑀R m [5] Suppose that u ϭ u 0 is a solution for p ϭ p 0 . Let…”
Section: Bifurcation Analysis Of the Steady-state Discretized Model A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microwave heating has been applied in a variety of applications including sintering and joining of ceramics 1 and chemical vapor infiltration of fiber-reinforced ceramic composites. [2][3][4][5] One of the major hurdles currently faced in the application of microwave processing of ceramics is the occurrence of thermal runaway. 6 This phenomenon corresponds to a situation in which a small change in the design or operating variables (such as the thickness of the sample or microwave power) causes a rather large increase (of the order of several hundred degrees) in the temperature of the material being heated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of them are based on the solutions of balance equations for heat and species mass concentrations; some also incorporate electromagnetics in order to represent the heating system. These models span from simple 1D approximations [45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57] to complex, 2D or 3D Finite Element of Finite Volume analyzes [58,59,60,61,62,63]. Their raw results are temperature and mass deposition profiles or fields, for chosen processing conditions (reactor geometry, temperature, pressure, gas composition, porous preform characteristics).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%