1978
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4616/4/6/016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-fluid model of nuclear rotations and surface vibrations

Abstract: A simple phenomenological two-fluid model of nuclear collective motion previously used by the authors to discuss rotations is extended to include surface vibrations.The model is applied to a study of the rare-earth nuclei 154Gd, 164Er and 168Yb in an investigation of the rotation-vibration coupling in the presence of Coriolis antipairing effects and of the effects of Coriolis antipairing in the / I bands.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed moment of inertia is a factor of about two smaller than that for a rigid flow. These results suggested to Cusson and others [23][24][25][26] to use a velocity field that is a sum of irrotational-flow and rigid-body velocity fields and to show that any value of the moment of inertia between those for irrotational and rigid-body flows can be obtained by adjusting the ratio of these two velocity fields. Other authors [27][28][29] used a classical two-fluid model consisting of an inner non-rotating (superfluid) core fluid and a rotating outer (normal) fluid to obtain agreement with the experimental data for the moment of inertia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The observed moment of inertia is a factor of about two smaller than that for a rigid flow. These results suggested to Cusson and others [23][24][25][26] to use a velocity field that is a sum of irrotational-flow and rigid-body velocity fields and to show that any value of the moment of inertia between those for irrotational and rigid-body flows can be obtained by adjusting the ratio of these two velocity fields. Other authors [27][28][29] used a classical two-fluid model consisting of an inner non-rotating (superfluid) core fluid and a rotating outer (normal) fluid to obtain agreement with the experimental data for the moment of inertia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…As noted in Section 2.1, it is desirable (as a step in solving the rotation-intrinsic Schrödinger equation (24) or (26) or (28)) to choose the Euler angle θ such that the Coriolis-coupling term F Φ in Eq. (24) or (26) or (28) vanishes, and hence to account completely for the effect of the Coriolis interaction on the rotational (i.e., on the kinematic moment of inertia ) and intrinsic motions.…”
Section: Condition For Zero Coriolis-coupling Term or Adiabaticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations