2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04271-3_122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Two-Level Approach Towards Semantic Colon Segmentation: Removing Extra-Colonic Findings

Abstract: Abstract.Computer aided detection (CAD) of colonic polyps in computed tomographic colonography has tremendously impacted colorectal cancer diagnosis using 3D medical imaging. It is a prerequisite for all CAD systems to extract the air-distended colon segments from 3D abdomen computed tomography scans. In this paper, we present a two-level statistical approach of first separating colon segments from small intestine, stomach and other extra-colonic parts by classification on a new geometric feature set; then eva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For centerline based schemes, > 40% polyps are non-retrievable or can not be directly handled by [1][2][3][4], mainly due to collapsed colon segmentation in at least one prone or supine volume of 31% training, or 36% testing cases. [13]reports that ∼ 40% volumes have collapsed colon segments in a clinical dataset. Note that, by normalizing against the polyp retrieval upper bounds (55 ∼ 59% for geometric and 93 ∼ 94% for metric learning) respectively, in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For centerline based schemes, > 40% polyps are non-retrievable or can not be directly handled by [1][2][3][4], mainly due to collapsed colon segmentation in at least one prone or supine volume of 31% training, or 36% testing cases. [13]reports that ∼ 40% volumes have collapsed colon segments in a clinical dataset. Note that, by normalizing against the polyp retrieval upper bounds (55 ∼ 59% for geometric and 93 ∼ 94% for metric learning) respectively, in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The labeled vessel tree may enable automated distinction between the colon and small bowel. Other methods [30–31] have been proposed to model vessel trees. Lu et al [30] used a hierarchical machine learning approach to label and segment generic tubular structures in medical images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods [30–31] have been proposed to model vessel trees. Lu et al [30] used a hierarchical machine learning approach to label and segment generic tubular structures in medical images. Statistical machine learning methods have their merits to handle uncertain problems, such as missing arteries because of vessel segmentation limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Air compartments can be effectively extracted using a generic 3D region growing algorithm and the air intensity range. However they may be from lung and other extra-colonic regions (e.g., small intestine, stomach) and we eliminate extra-colonic air findings, via robust component-level structure parsing using geometric features and rank-one SVM classification [4]. On the other hand, when searching tagging materials, we need to avoid the bone tissue voxels since they have similar Hounsfield units or CT intensity values.…”
Section: Bounding Box Generation Of Tagging Roismentioning
confidence: 99%