2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappmathmech.2009.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-parameter friction model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rolling friction is there modelled as a resistance against motion of the area of deformation over the body [11] and, ignoring the problem of rotation of the elliptical region, is consistent with the results obtained under the assumption of the linear hysteresis [12][13][14][15]. Karapetyan [16] proposed a two-parametric model of friction forces for spherical contact between a ball and planar base being a result of deformations of the contacting bodies. This model joins three different kinds of friction (Coulomb, Contensou and rolling friction) and can be seen as a development of Zhuravlev model.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Rolling friction is there modelled as a resistance against motion of the area of deformation over the body [11] and, ignoring the problem of rotation of the elliptical region, is consistent with the results obtained under the assumption of the linear hysteresis [12][13][14][15]. Karapetyan [16] proposed a two-parametric model of friction forces for spherical contact between a ball and planar base being a result of deformations of the contacting bodies. This model joins three different kinds of friction (Coulomb, Contensou and rolling friction) and can be seen as a development of Zhuravlev model.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The possibility of detachment of the body from the plane and aspects of the friction law were discussed in [3,11]. There are also models of friction when the contact between the rigid body and the plane is no longer a point but a small region and the friction force is obtained by integration over the whole contact region, see, e.g., [6,14,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike Zhuravlev's assumptions, 1,2 we shall assume that the interaction of the sphere with the plane is described by the friction model proposed by Karapetyan. 3,4 , We will assume that e 1 , e 2 , e 3 is a right-handed, orthonormalized moving frame of reference such that the unit vector e 1 is directed along the sliding velocity, u = ue 1 , of the sphere (that is, along the velocity of the point of contact of the sphere with the support plane), the unit vector e 2 is orthogonal to the sliding velocity u and, like e 1 , lies in the horizontal plane, and the unit vector e 3 is directed along the ascending vertical, u s = u + [, ae 3 ] is the velocity of the centre of mass of the sphere and = 1 e 1 + 2 e 2 + 3 e 3 is the angular velocity of the sphere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigation of the dynamics of the sphere for the motions (3) reduces to an analysis of the system of equations (4) where 6 (5) k > 0 is the coefficient of friction and ∈ [0,1] and ∈ [0,1] are the parameters of the friction model ( ≤ ). Theorem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation