2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3023741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Two-Phase Distributed Ruin-and-Recreate Genetic Algorithm for Solving the Vehicle Routing Problem With Time Windows

Abstract: Developing an algorithm that can solve the vehicle routing problem with time windows (VRPTW) and create near-optimal solutions with the least difference in magnitude is a challenging task. This task is evident from the fact that when an algorithm runs multiple times based on a given instance, the generated solutions deviate from each other and may not near-optimal. For this reason, an algorithm that can solve these problems is effective and highly sought after. This paper proposes a novel systematic framework … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, LNS-MRSO attains a remarkable score of 994 in terms of total distance traveled, ranking fourth and significantly surpassing the BKS. As the bolded data shows, only three algorithms, namely MFGA [21], RRGA [54], and Tabu-ABC [55], outperform LNS-MRSO in this metric. A common characteristic among these superior algorithms is their capacity to reduce the total travel distance by increasing the number of vehicles utilized.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, LNS-MRSO attains a remarkable score of 994 in terms of total distance traveled, ranking fourth and significantly surpassing the BKS. As the bolded data shows, only three algorithms, namely MFGA [21], RRGA [54], and Tabu-ABC [55], outperform LNS-MRSO in this metric. A common characteristic among these superior algorithms is their capacity to reduce the total travel distance by increasing the number of vehicles utilized.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, VRPTW has become an active area of research, and several studies have focused on developing new algorithms and techniques to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of vehicle routing. However, despite significant progress, there are still several challenges that need to be addressed, including the incorporation of multiple constraints [2][3][4][5][13][14][15][16][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45], multiple objects [2,4,5,16,[45][46][47][48], the use of realistic datasets [4,28,49,50], and the adaptation of solutions to real-world scenarios [8,9,20,25,28,38,[51][52][53]. Another important challenge in the context of VRPTW is the evaluation and comparison of existing algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, researchers often use a metaheuristic algorithm or an improved heuristic algorithm to solve the optimal combinatorial optimization problem [12]. The metaheuristic algorithms commonly used by scholars in this field include tabu search (TS) algorithms [13], [14], simulated annealing algorithms (SAA) [15], genetic algorithms (GA) [16], ant colony algorithms (ACA) [17], and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms [18]. Due to the positive feedback performance and simple operation of ACA, many scholars use this algorithm to solve the vehicle routing problem [19]- [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…obtained by two successive iterations is less than 0.001. If the trigger condition is satisfied, the pheromone volatilization coefficient is adjusted according to equation(16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%