2023
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-scale numerical study on the mechanobiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Misael Dalbosco,
Michele Terzano,
Thiago A. Carniel
et al.

Abstract: Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are a serious condition whose pathophysiology is related to phenomena occurring at different length scales. To gain a better understanding of the disease, this work presents a multi-scale computational study that correlates AAA progression with microstructural and mechanical alterations in the tissue. Macro-scale geometries of a healthy aorta and idealized aneurysms with increasing diameter are developed on the basis of existing experimental data and subjected to physiological… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 90 publications
(195 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, refining the numerical model and the theoretical assumptions may be a means of improving the procedure. A single-layer artery with an isotropic material was considered for this model, but multiple-layer anisotropic hyperelastic materials have also been proposed [ 42 , 57 , 58 ]. Local heterogeneities of the thickness and mechanical properties of the aneurysm walls could also be added to get close to clinical observations [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, refining the numerical model and the theoretical assumptions may be a means of improving the procedure. A single-layer artery with an isotropic material was considered for this model, but multiple-layer anisotropic hyperelastic materials have also been proposed [ 42 , 57 , 58 ]. Local heterogeneities of the thickness and mechanical properties of the aneurysm walls could also be added to get close to clinical observations [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%