2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2012.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-sided reputation result with long-run players

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ekmekci et al (2012) showed that impermanent types would lead to permanent reputations, as well. Atakan and Ekmekci (2012, 2013, 2015 provided positive and negative results on permanent reputations with long-lived players on both sides. Liu (2011) provided dynamics that explain accumulation, consumption, and restoration of reputation when the discovery of the past is costly.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ekmekci et al (2012) showed that impermanent types would lead to permanent reputations, as well. Atakan and Ekmekci (2012, 2013, 2015 provided positive and negative results on permanent reputations with long-lived players on both sides. Liu (2011) provided dynamics that explain accumulation, consumption, and restoration of reputation when the discovery of the past is costly.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levine (1989, 1992) studied reputation in repeated games with one long-run player facing a sequence of short-run players. In contrast, the literature on reputation with two long-run players is very recent (see Cripps et al, 2005, Atakan and Ekmekci, 2011, 2012, 2013 We proceed as follows. Section 2 describes the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When one player's type is private information, the issue is cast as whether equilibria with low payoffs for that player can be eliminated; see, for example, Cripps and Thomas (1997) and Cripps et al (2005). More recently, there has been research allowing both players to have private information; see, for example, Atakan and Ekmekci (2008). Also relevant is work on relational contracts where, in a different setting and with a different mechanism than that modeled here, players learn to cooperate more effectively (while in our setting, they simply learn to cooperate); see Chassang (2010) and Halac (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%