2021
DOI: 10.1629/uksg.550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-stage approach to serials review: minimizing journal costs through title-by-title selection with package-based acquisition

Abstract: Many academic libraries evaluate their journal holdings with an emphasis on deselection rather than selection. Likewise, many consider each journal package or full-text database as a whole, through indicators such as cost per download, without explicitly accounting for the quality of the journals included in each package. Better results can be achieved through a two-stage process that first identifies the 'wanted journals' most important to the university's teaching and research programs, then objectively dete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More generally, publishers should better understand the collection development strategies adopted, consciously or unconsciously, by librarians and other decision‐makers. Some of these strategies have been fully documented in the library literature (e.g., Walters & Markgren, 2020, 2021a) while others may need to be explored through conversations with current and potential customers. After all, it is good to know whether most undergraduate institutions regard the journals in each subject area as potential substitutes, but perhaps more useful to know how each individual institution determines how or when a substitution will be made.…”
Section: Implications and Possibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, publishers should better understand the collection development strategies adopted, consciously or unconsciously, by librarians and other decision‐makers. Some of these strategies have been fully documented in the library literature (e.g., Walters & Markgren, 2020, 2021a) while others may need to be explored through conversations with current and potential customers. After all, it is good to know whether most undergraduate institutions regard the journals in each subject area as potential substitutes, but perhaps more useful to know how each individual institution determines how or when a substitution will be made.…”
Section: Implications and Possibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%