2023
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2022.3230682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Two-Stage Optimization Method for Schedule and Trajectory of CAVs at an Isolated Autonomous Intersection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the BILSTM model, following the methodology outlined in [49], we configured the number of neurons in each hidden layer to be 24, set the training epochs to 50, established the input length as 12, determined the batch size as 32, set the learning rate to 0.001, and applied the tanh(•) activation function for the fully connected layer. Consistent with the approach detailed in [50], we set the time slot interval to 10 s. Each segment's duration was set to 1000 milliseconds, in line with the recommendation in [51], and each autonomous vehicle was assumed to possess storage space significantly larger than the preloaded segment size. Furthermore, the passenger count within each autonomous vehicle was subject to variation, with possible values ranging from 1 to 4.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the BILSTM model, following the methodology outlined in [49], we configured the number of neurons in each hidden layer to be 24, set the training epochs to 50, established the input length as 12, determined the batch size as 32, set the learning rate to 0.001, and applied the tanh(•) activation function for the fully connected layer. Consistent with the approach detailed in [50], we set the time slot interval to 10 s. Each segment's duration was set to 1000 milliseconds, in line with the recommendation in [51], and each autonomous vehicle was assumed to possess storage space significantly larger than the preloaded segment size. Furthermore, the passenger count within each autonomous vehicle was subject to variation, with possible values ranging from 1 to 4.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, several works in literature attempted to use mixed-integer linear programming (MILP). For example, [27] benefited from advantages of different intersection modeling approaches to optimize the CAVs crossing with V2V and V2I communications using MILP. Likewise, the study [28] exploited an intersection control system using dynamic programming and MILP that took advantage of CAVs as traffic regulators in a mixed traffic environment.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research have introduced optimization strategies to further improve intersection performance, including bilevel programming [5,6], tree search [7], and machine learning [8][9][10][11], reservation optimization [12], other strategies [13,14], yielding satisfactory schedule results. However, Lioris et al [15] found that increasing intersection capacity is feasible when vehicles traverse intersections as platoons rather than individually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%