2014
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-stage statistical procedure for feature selection and comparison in functional analysis of metagenomes

Abstract: Supplementary file is available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The differential expression of specific bacterial genera between groups was determined using the two-stage statistical procedure. 23 This was a statistical algorithm developed by Pookhao et al 23 to detect differentially abundant features in large metagenomes under various conditions. In the first stage, the algorithm aims to detect informative features associated with a particular phenotype that results in the dimensional reduction of the metagenomic data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differential expression of specific bacterial genera between groups was determined using the two-stage statistical procedure. 23 This was a statistical algorithm developed by Pookhao et al 23 to detect differentially abundant features in large metagenomes under various conditions. In the first stage, the algorithm aims to detect informative features associated with a particular phenotype that results in the dimensional reduction of the metagenomic data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For results of biochemical assays, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to check for normality; the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare any two data sets that were not normally distributed, and the values were presented as median (25th and 75th percentiles); otherwise, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls method was used, and the values were presented as mean 6 SME; all p values were adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). Both the Wilcoxon rank sum test combined with the Benjamini-Hochberg method and a two-stage statisti-cal procedure were applied to compare bacteria taxa (Pookhao et al, 2015). Metabolites were selected by SIMCA-P-12.0 and compared by one-way ANOVA followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls method.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For whole metagenome shotgun projects, where gene protein coding information is available, functional comparative metagenomics is possible. It is based on identifying differential feature abundance (pathways, subsystems, or functional roles) between two or more conditions following a statistical procedure with some normalization step (Rodriguez-Brito et al, 2006 ; Pookhao et al, 2015 ). Some useful tools to perform robust comparative functional metagenomics are Parallel-meta and MEGAN.…”
Section: Comparative Metagenomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%