2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC) 2018
DOI: 10.23919/pscc.2018.8442586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Two-Step Distribution System State Estimator with Grid Constraints and Mixed Measurements

Abstract: In this paper we consider the problem of State Estimation (SE) in large-scale, 3-phase coupled, unbalanced distribution systems. More specifically, we address the problem of including mixed real-time measurements, synchronized and unsynchronized, from phasor measurement units and smart meters, into existing SE solutions. We propose a computationally efficient two-step method to update a prior solution using the measurements, while taking into account physical constraints caused by zero-injection buses. We test… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in [8], splitting the problem in two steps yields the same first-order approximation as solving the problem in one step. Moreover, the posterior minimumvariance estimator using the linear update (6), is equal to the maximum-likelihood using a weighted least-squares approach [13]. Therefore, we can conclude that for an SE method that assumes Gaussian noises and performs a maximum likelihood estimation, the posterior covariance will be approximately the one in (7), and thus the method developed here for optimal sensor placement can be also extended for other SE techniques satisfying these conditions.…”
Section: B Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in [8], splitting the problem in two steps yields the same first-order approximation as solving the problem in one step. Moreover, the posterior minimumvariance estimator using the linear update (6), is equal to the maximum-likelihood using a weighted least-squares approach [13]. Therefore, we can conclude that for an SE method that assumes Gaussian noises and performs a maximum likelihood estimation, the posterior covariance will be approximately the one in (7), and thus the method developed here for optimal sensor placement can be also extended for other SE techniques satisfying these conditions.…”
Section: B Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…As explained in [13], several different sources of information can be available to solve the SE problem: 1) Pseudo-measurements, i.e., load estimations S psd based on predictions and/or known installed load capacity at every bus. Since these pseudo-measurements are estimations rather than actual measurements, we model their uncertainty using a Gaussian noise with a relative large standard deviation (a typical value can be σ psd ≈ 50% [12]).…”
Section: B Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations