2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/2054873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Two‐Step Hybrid Approach for Modeling the Nonlinear Dynamic Response of Piezoelectric Energy Harvesters

Abstract: An effective hybrid computational framework is described here in order to assess the nonlinear dynamic response of piezoelectric energy harvesting devices. The proposed strategy basically consists of two steps. First, fully coupled multiphysics finite element (FE) analyses are performed to evaluate the nonlinear static response of the device. An enhanced reduced-order model is then derived, where the global dynamic response is formulated in the state-space using lumped coefficients enriched with the informatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ζ 1 is the first modal mechanical damping ratio, ω 1 is the first undamped natural frequency, θ 1 is the modal electromechanical coupling terms, F 1 is the first modal mechanical forcing function, C 1 is the capacitance, R 1 is the load resistance and υ = (V t − V b ) is the voltage response across the external resistive load. For further information on the device material properties and geometry, the interested reader can refer to [49]. In practice, this is a single input (F 1 ) and multiple output (η 1 and υ) system.…”
Section: Benchmark Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where ζ 1 is the first modal mechanical damping ratio, ω 1 is the first undamped natural frequency, θ 1 is the modal electromechanical coupling terms, F 1 is the first modal mechanical forcing function, C 1 is the capacitance, R 1 is the load resistance and υ = (V t − V b ) is the voltage response across the external resistive load. For further information on the device material properties and geometry, the interested reader can refer to [49]. In practice, this is a single input (F 1 ) and multiple output (η 1 and υ) system.…”
Section: Benchmark Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, the identification of electromechanical modal parameters of piezoelectric structures is important to enable a correct implementation of these devices for energy harvesting, vibration control and health monitoring applications [48]. Reduced-order modal models can usually arise from numerical finite element (FE) [49] or distributed analytical approaches [21,23]. Porfiri et al [25] proposed two techniques for estimating piezoelectric modal couplings and piezoelectric modal capacitances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electromechanical characteristics of the piezoelectric material are taken from Maruccio et al. (2016), whereas the thickness values refer to a commercially available cantilever bimorph made of standard PVDF films already investigated within past studies (Elvin et al., 2006; Elvin & Elvin, 2012; Maruccio et al., 2018). Finally, length and width of the piezoelectric beam are assumed constant values, with l=90mm$l=90\,\textrm {mm}$ and b=30mm$b=30\,\textrm {mm}$.…”
Section: Numerical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal value of 𝐝 is carried out by solving Equation (8) for 𝑢 max = 0.25𝑙 so as to ensure an essentially linear behavior in agreement with previous studies on piezoelectric energy harvesters (Elvin & Elvin, 2012;Maruccio et al, 2018). The amplitude of the design harmonic load η𝑑 (𝑡) is the mean of the peak accelerations carried out from a preliminary set of 1 × 10 4 simulations.…”
Section: Optimal Parameters Of the Energy Harvestermentioning
confidence: 99%