2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-step machining and active learning approach for right-first-time robotic countersinking through in-process error compensation and prediction of depth of cuts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The available techniques rely on algorithms that actively selects informative samples to be labeled by the human expert. An acquisition function is used to score the unannotated data which will then contribute to a faster learning of the machine learning model [48]. (2) To avoid the extensive testing for optimal hyperparameters, recent work has proposed the differentiable spectrogram where the window size and hop length are jointly optimized with the model parameters [49].…”
Section: Signal Processing For Machining Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available techniques rely on algorithms that actively selects informative samples to be labeled by the human expert. An acquisition function is used to score the unannotated data which will then contribute to a faster learning of the machine learning model [48]. (2) To avoid the extensive testing for optimal hyperparameters, recent work has proposed the differentiable spectrogram where the window size and hop length are jointly optimized with the model parameters [49].…”
Section: Signal Processing For Machining Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%