A two-way process? A qualitative and quantitative investigation of majority members’ acculturation

Haugen, Ingvild; Kunst, Jonas R.

doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.07.004

Cited by 69 publications

(70 citation statements)

References 76 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, the PARI model recognizes the fact that migrant integration depends on both groups. This approach resonates with existing models of acculturation that have recognized the importance of a dual perspective that considers responses by both acculturating minority members and majority members (Bourhis et al, 1997;Berry, 2005;Haugen & Kunst, 2017;Sam & Berry, 2010;Ward & Geeraert, 2016). Going beyond these existing models, however, the PARI model conceptualizes how responses of both refugees and residents are affected by perceptions and subjective representations of forcedness and related perils.…”

Section: Structure and Rationale Of The Pari Modelmentioning

confidence: 63%

Psychological Antecedents of Refugee Integration (PARI)

Echterhoff¹,

Hellmann²,

Back³

et al. 2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The successful management of refugee immigration, including refugee integration in host societies, requires a sound understanding of underlying psychological processes. We propose a model of the Psychological Antecedents of Refugee Integration (PARI), highlighting perceived forcedness (i.e., coercion and loss of control from “push” factors) and ensuing perils (risks and potential suffering during migration) as distinctive factors of refugee (vs. voluntary) migration. According to our model, perceptions and subjective representations of forcedness and associated perils activate specific psychological processes relevant to refugee integration and thus moderate responses to the demands and stressor of the immigration situation. We conceptualize these distinctive influences for integration-relevant processes in both refugees and in residents. By pinpointing the unique features of refugee migration, PARI generates novel and specific hypotheses about psychological processes predicting refugee integration. For instance, refugees’ memories of forcedness and associated perils should lead to high preoccupation with the restoration of basic needs after arrival in a receiving country, which interferes with integration-related activities. Conversely, residents’ perceptions of forcedness and related perils may enhance empathy with refugees, but may also magnify feelings of anxiety and threat. Implications for refugee integration are discussed for the domains of occupational work, education, and mental health.

show abstract

Section: Structure and Rationale Of The Pari Modelmentioning

confidence: 63%

Psychological Antecedents of Refugee Integration (PARI)

Echterhoff¹,

Hellmann²,

Back³

et al. 2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Namely, previous research on immigrant integration could be criticized for over-reliance on sample homogeneity: most studies have assumed that patterns at the level of the sample apply to all (or most) participants (for research examples, see Sam & Berry, 2016). Acculturation psychological research has increasingly started to acknowledge the value of a person-oriented approach and complemented the predominantly variable-oriented literature by examining the variety of profiles among different immigrant subgroups (Bámaca-Colbert & Gayles, 2010;Grigoryev & van de Vijver, 2018;Haugen & Kunst, 2017;Inguglia & Musso, 2015;Kruusvall et al, 2009;Maehler et al, 2019;Mancini, Navas, López-Rodríguez, & Bottura, 2018).…”

Section: Aim and Research Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Citizenship and socio-political integration: A person-oriented analysis among Russian-speaking minorities in Estonia, Finland and Norway

Renvik

Manner

Vetik

et al. 2020

J. Soc. Polit. Psych.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This survey study utilized a person-oriented approach to explore the patterns of socio-political integration among Russian-speaking minority group members in three neighboring countries in the Baltic area: Estonia (n = 482), Finland (n = 252), and Norway (n = 215). Three profiles were obtained in all countries: critical integration, separation, and assimilation. In the whole sample, critical integration was the most common acculturation profile. After the profiles were established, they were examined vis-à-vis citizenship and integration context to see, whether and to what extent, the objective (i.e., citizenship) and subjective (i.e., perceived social status and sense of belonging) socio-political integration of Russian-speakers corresponded with each other. Critical integration and separation were the most common profiles among participants holding national citizenship of the country of residence, while foreign citizenship was not related to any specific profile. Separation was rare among participants holding dual citizenship, but it was the most common profile among participants with undetermined citizenship. Also, intergroup context was associated with socio-political integration: critical integration and separation were the most common profiles of Russian-speakers in Estonia, critical integration and assimilation profiles in Finland, and assimilation profile in Norway. The results are discussed in relation to previous variable-oriented research and official integration policies of the countries studied.

show abstract

“…These strategies can be considered acculturation preferences . A more recent research focus has been the impact of the policies, practices, and attitudes of the host society, and specifically, host community members' acculturation expectations (e.g., Haugen & Kunst, 2017; Horenczyk, Jasinskaja‐Lahti, Sam, & Vedder, 2013).…”

Section: Misperceptions About Othersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Host‐member misperceptions about what others expect of immigrants: The role of personal attitudes, voting behaviour, and right‐wing authoritarianism

Leviston

Coenen

Dandy

2020

Asian J of Social Psycho

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Concordant acculturation expectations and preferences between a host society and its immigrants are important for social cohesion. But perceptions of others' attitudes are often distorted, and may extend to intracultural misperceptions about what others in one's own society expect for immigrants. We test whether attitudinal misperceptions operate in the context of host-members' acculturation expectations of immigrants-preferences about whether newcomers should embrace the majority culture, or maintain their own cultural heritage. Further, we test whether the conservative dimension of right-wing authoritarianism (RWA-C) drives both personal acculturation expectations and distortions about what others expect. We surveyed a representative sample of 2,013 Australian citizens about their own acculturation expectations for immigrants and their perceptions of the expectations of the host society in general. People significantly overestimated the extent to which fellow host society members expect immigrants to embrace the host culture, and underestimated expectations that immigrants retain their own culture. Voting behaviour and RWA-C were related to personal acculturation expectations and to perceptions of host society consensus with their own views (self-other discrepancy). Moreover, personal acculturation expectations mediated the link between RWA-C and perceived self-other discrepancy. The psychological bases of these misperceptions, and their potential ramifications for immigrants, are discussed.

show abstract

A two-way process? A qualitative and quantitative investigation of majority members’ acculturation

Abstract: A two-way process? A qualitative and quantitative investigation of majority members' acculturation Acculturation refers to changes in cultural patterns that result from first-hand contact between different ethno-cultural groups over time (Berry, 1997; Redfeld, Linton, &

Cited by 69 publications

References 76 publications

Psychological Antecedents of Refugee Integration (PARI)

Psychological Antecedents of Refugee Integration (PARI)

Citizenship and socio-political integration: A person-oriented analysis among Russian-speaking minorities in Estonia, Finland and Norway

Host‐member misperceptions about what others expect of immigrants: The role of personal attitudes, voting behaviour, and right‐wing authoritarianism

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About