2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2018.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A typical postcesarean epithelioid trophoblastic lesion with placenta increta: Case report and literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, medical imaging examination is becoming more and more important in clinical work, especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination, which has advantages irreplaceable by other imaging examinations in the localization and qualitative diagnosis of lesions [ 3 , 4 ]. Currently, the two most commonly used methods for diagnosis of placenta accreta are ultrasound and MRI, and ultrasound is considered to be the preferred method because of its low cost, noninvasiveness, and simplicity of operation, which is able to determine the location and predict the status of placenta accreta [ 5 , 6 ]. However, ultrasound is easily affected by operator technique, placental location, the amount of amniotic fluid, the thicker adipose tissue in the abdominal wall of pregnant women, and other factors that lead to unclear visualization of the placenta on the back wall of the uterus, and thus has some limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, medical imaging examination is becoming more and more important in clinical work, especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination, which has advantages irreplaceable by other imaging examinations in the localization and qualitative diagnosis of lesions [ 3 , 4 ]. Currently, the two most commonly used methods for diagnosis of placenta accreta are ultrasound and MRI, and ultrasound is considered to be the preferred method because of its low cost, noninvasiveness, and simplicity of operation, which is able to determine the location and predict the status of placenta accreta [ 5 , 6 ]. However, ultrasound is easily affected by operator technique, placental location, the amount of amniotic fluid, the thicker adipose tissue in the abdominal wall of pregnant women, and other factors that lead to unclear visualization of the placenta on the back wall of the uterus, and thus has some limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%