2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1466-822x.2003.00018.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A typing error in Tokeshi's test of bimodality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Species incidences within an island were measured as the number of plots where a species was recorded (maximum ten). To test for bimodality, we computed the Tokeshi statistical test for bimodality (Tokeshi 1992, Barreto et al 2003.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species incidences within an island were measured as the number of plots where a species was recorded (maximum ten). To test for bimodality, we computed the Tokeshi statistical test for bimodality (Tokeshi 1992, Barreto et al 2003.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2000). They show that an increase in the extent of their study area (to an area similar to ours) changed the occupancy frequency distribution of forest birds from a bimodal to a unimodal pattern – despite the shortcomings of technical caveats of van Rensburg et al 's (2000) analyses addressed by Barreto et al. (2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%