2017
DOI: 10.1080/14681366.2017.1345975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A typology of agency in new generation learning environments: emerging relational, ecological and new material considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
51
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Relational agency is ‘the capacity to align one's thought and actions with those of others in order to interpret problems of practice and to respond to those interpretations’ . It is a dynamic interaction between engagement with others to discover new perspectives and integrating those perspectives into one's practice …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relational agency is ‘the capacity to align one's thought and actions with those of others in order to interpret problems of practice and to respond to those interpretations’ . It is a dynamic interaction between engagement with others to discover new perspectives and integrating those perspectives into one's practice …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this position, Principals are expected to "'make things happen' as conduits for the implementation of government-driven reform, or more autonomously seeking to set the direction for [schooling] improvement and responding to independent change agendas" (Wallace, O'Reilly, Morris, & Deem, 2011, p. 66). Although agency has been well theorised (Archer, 2010;Biesta et al, 2017;Charteris & Smardon, 2017), little has been written about teacher agency (Biesta et al, 2017;Charteris & Smardon, 2015) and even less about the agency of Principals (Riveros et al, 2017;Wenner & Settlage, 2015). We conceptualise agency as the interplay of discursive, social and material influences that shape, and are in turn, shaped by school leaders.…”
Section: Agency and Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are agentic when they make sense of the complex entanglements of policy, community and schooling discourses. Although we recognise that the notion of agency has a long theoretical history and has been conceptualised in a range of ways, in this article it is considered from an ecological perspective where it is a temporal process of social engagement that is informed by the experiences of the past, oriented to the future as a capacity for further thought and action, and enacted in the present as the capacity to mobilise relevant discourses and resources (Biesta, Priestley & Robinson, 2017;Charteris & Smardon, 2017). This implies that agency is emergent, involving the "individual efforts, available resources and contextual and structural factors" that interplay in particular situations (Biesta & Tedder, 2007, p. 137).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Student-centred practices can involve tailoring personalised programs but may not foster student participation and agency. Although agency as a discourse is widely interpreted and enacted in different ways (Charteris & Smardon, 2017), we use it here is its ecological sense.…”
Section: Discourse Of Student Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More broadly, this article seeks to further contribute to existing literature that critiques the hegemony of neoliberal schooling and ITE practices (Ball, 2015;Lingard, Martino, & Rezai-Rashti, 2013;Sellar, 2014). In so doing, it builds upon existing scholarship that has challenged the politics of assessment discourses (Thompson & Cook, 2014;Thompson & Mockler, 2016;Tuinamuana, 2011) and frames emerging conceptualisations of agency in ecological terms (Biesta, Priestley, & Robinson, 2017;Charteris & Smardon, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%