A Typology of Coproduction: Emphasizing Shared Power

Souza, Victor Burigo; Neto, Luís Moretto

doi:10.1108/s2045-794420180000006006

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Community‐based organizations are likely to play different roles at various stages of public service provision (Cheng 2019). Finally, as the responses to COVID‐19 are shaped by their historical and institutional contexts (Moloney and Moloney 2020), future research should examine how mandated versus voluntary coproduction and state‐lead versus community‐led coproduction work in different countries and cultural contexts (Souza and Neto 2018). Local experimentations stimulated by the COVID‐19 crisis provide an ideal context to study these complex interactions for coproduction research.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coproducing Responses to COVID‐19 with Community‐Based Organizations: Lessons from Zhejiang Province, China

Cheng

Shen

et al. 2020

Public Administration Review

141

105

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zhejiang Province achieved one of the best records in containing the COVID‐19 pandemic in China. What lessons can the world learn from it? What roles do community‐based organizations play in this success story? Based on more than 100 interviews during and after the outbreak in Zhejiang, this article provides a road map of how community‐based organizations were involved in the three distinct stages of Zhejiang's response to COVID‐19. The authors recommend that public sector leaders (1) strategically leverage the strengths of community‐based organizations at multiple stages of the COVID‐19 response; (2) incentivize volunteers to participate in epidemic prevention and control; (3) provide data infrastructure and digital tracking platforms; and (4) build trust and long‐term capacity of community‐based organizations.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coproducing Responses to COVID‐19 with Community‐Based Organizations: Lessons from Zhejiang Province, China

Cheng

Shen

et al. 2020

Public Administration Review

141

105

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These ideas are also quite similar to the political and administrative philosophies of Hannah Arendt and Mary Parker Follett (Stivers, 2002, 2008; Stout, 2010a; Stout & Love, 2015a; Stout & Staton, 2011), or what has been called the Collaborative Tradition of public administration (Stout, 2009, 2013). Governance practices for collaboration with citizens (Vigoda, 2002) include citizen governance (Box, 1998), deliberative democracy and participatory policy making (Ansell, 2011; deLeon, 1992; Dryzek, 1990; Fischer, 2003; Forester, 1999; Fox & Miller, 1995), public engagement (Ansell & Gash, 2008; Fung, 2004; Innes & Booher, 2004; King et al, 1998; Nabatchi & Leighninger, 2015), coproduction in implementation (Sharp, 1980; Souza & Neto, 2019; Whitaker, 1980), participatory action research (Bartels, 2012; Cook & Wagenaar, 2012; Vandenbussche et al, 2020), and collaborative network governance (Keast et al, 2004). These varied practices assume people’s capacity to work together in self-governance.…”

Section: Which Ontology For a Sustainable Future?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Competing Ontologies: A Redux Primer for Public Administration

Stout

Love

2021

The American Review of Public Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last decade, a growing number of public administration theorists have taken up the question of how ontology—assumptions about the nature of existence—shapes our understanding of governance. This substantially updated primer, originally published in Public Administration Review, introduces the essay, provides a basic explanation of ontology, describes the fundamental debates in philosophies of ontology, and discusses why ontology is important to social and political theory and therefore public administration theory and practice. Using an ideal-type approach grounded in differing ontological assumptions, a Governance Typology is provided to support analysis of differing public administration theories. An integrative approach to governance is offered that is grounded in relational process ontology—a foundation that may support a viable synthesis of the other four primary ideal-types. The essay concludes with a call for personal reflection on the part of scholars and practitioners regarding their own ontological commitments and an invitation to collaborative inquiry.

show abstract

“…Coproduction is based on a consulting practice. It gives direct participation in decision-making without substantive effect on the outcome, which further signifies efficiency and effectiveness in delivering expected services (Souza and Neto, 2018); hence, presenting a valuable interaction between the government and the public that bridges the gap in obtaining better policies (da Silva Craveiro and Albano, 2017). It is a dynamic way of conceptualising social structure and categories and stressing the interconnections between the macro and the micro; emergence and stabilisation; and knowledge and practice (Jasanoff, 2004).…”

Section: Research Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social media in aid of post disaster management

Malawani

Nurmandi

Purnomo

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to examine tweet posts regarding Typhoon Washi to contend the usefulness of social media and big data as an aid of post-disaster management. Through topic modelling and content analysis, this study examines the priorities of the victims expressed in Twitter and how the priorities changed over a year. Design/methodology/approach Social media, particularly Twitter, was where the data gathered. Using big data technology, the gathered data were processed and analysed according to the objectives of the study. Topic modelling was used in clustering words from different topics. Clustered words were then used for content analysis in determining the needs of the victims. Word frequency count was also used in determining what words were repeatedly used during the course period. To validate the gathered data online, government documents were requested and concerned government agencies were also interviewed. Finding Findings of this study argue that housing and relief goods have been the top priorities of the victims. Victims are seeking relief goods, especially when they are in evacuation centres. Also, the lack of legal basis hinders government officials from integrating social media information unto policymaking. Research limitation This study only reports Twitter posts containing keywords either, Sendong, SendongPH, Washi or TyphoonWashi. The keywords were determined based on the words that trended after Typhoon Washi struck. Practical implication For social media and big data to be adoptable and efficacious, supporting and facilitating conditions are necessary. Structural, technical and financial support, as well as legal framework, should be in place. Maintaining and sustaining positive attitude towards it should be taken care of. Originality/value Although many studies have been conducted on the usefulness of social media in times of disaster, many of these focused on the use of social media as medium that can efficiently spread information, and little has been done on how the government can use both social media and big data in collecting and analysing the needs of the victims. This study fills those gaps in social big data literature.

show abstract

A Typology of Coproduction: Emphasizing Shared Power

Cited by 5 publications

References 6 publications

Coproducing Responses to COVID‐19 with Community‐Based Organizations: Lessons from Zhejiang Province, China

Coproducing Responses to COVID‐19 with Community‐Based Organizations: Lessons from Zhejiang Province, China

Competing Ontologies: A Redux Primer for Public Administration

Social media in aid of post disaster management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About