1985
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.1985.11778702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Typology of Multicampus Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should also be their task to represent the CHEC in the decision-making procedures of the gestor university in operational issues, and to be an "interface" towards local actors. As Creswell says, having an administrative leader on the affiliate campus shifts the organizational solution towards decentralization (Creswell et al 1985). In Australia, most of the branch campuses have a campus director.…”
Section: A Proposal For the Governance And Management Of Community Himentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should also be their task to represent the CHEC in the decision-making procedures of the gestor university in operational issues, and to be an "interface" towards local actors. As Creswell says, having an administrative leader on the affiliate campus shifts the organizational solution towards decentralization (Creswell et al 1985). In Australia, most of the branch campuses have a campus director.…”
Section: A Proposal For the Governance And Management Of Community Himentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case, the college may have a governing board of its own, or it may be governed by the board of the university. Similarly, the administration of a multi-campus system may be centralized or decentralized, in the latter case with full administrative staff on each campus (Creswell et al 1985, Lombardi et al 2002. Each solution has advantages and drawbacks thoroughly discussed in the literature.…”
Section: Community Colleges In the Usamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have found that effective online program administrators typically rely 3 on business models that are different from those used to manage face-to-face programs (Chaney, Chaney, & Eddy, 2010;Discenza, Howard, & Schenk, 2002;Lowenthal & White, 2014;Rovai, 2003;Rovai & Downey, 2010). Additionally, online programs are typically managed with different policies, (Gaskell & Hayton, 2015;Kenward, 2008;Levy & Beaulieu, 2003;Maguire, 2007) organizational structures and staffing (Creswell, Roskens, & Henry, 1985;Garrison & Kanuka, 2008;Hanna, 2013). In order to find the appropriate approach to administer online programming, Berge (2007) suggests that institutions adapt their strategic planning and quality assurance practices to the unique needs of online students.…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study sought to understand how institutions affiliated with a statewide university system administer their online programs. Since each multicampus or public statewide system differs in significant ways (Creswell, Roskens, & Henry, 1985;Lee & Bowen, 1971), researchers have suggested that statewide or multicampus postsecondary systems be evaluated as discrete objects of analysis in terms of their structural and organizational characteristics (Creswell, Roskens, & Henry, 1985;King, 2013;Lane & Johnstone, 2013). Consequently, the following research questions, which consider how each system institution differs from the other, guided this study:…”
Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation