A typology of undergraduate students' conceptions of size and scale: Identifying and characterizing conceptual variation

Abstract

The importance of ''size and scale'' in nanoscience and engineering has been recognized by both scientists and science educators. A solid understanding of this concept is key to the learning of nanoscience. Students, however, have been reported to have considerable difficulty grasping this concept; yet little is known regarding their state of understanding. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a series of studies that were aimed at exploring the different ways students conceive of ''size and scale'' in the context of undergraduate nanoscience and engineering courses. Informed by Variation Theory of Learning (Marton and Booth, 1997), we identified four major categories (with two sub-categories within each) of student conception-fragmented, linear, proportional, and logarithmic. These conception categories, together with the aspects of variation that characterize and distinguish them, are summarized in a typology. In addition to serving as a diagnostic tool to describe students' understanding, this typology can also be used to guide the development of instructional interventions that facilitate students to move toward a more sophisticated understanding of ''size and scale.'' ß

Biological Principles and Threshold Concepts for Understanding Natural Selection

“…However, the teaching and learning of concepts related to size and scale present major challenges. For example, Swarat et al (2011) identified three major ways students conceive scale: linear (representing direct observation or experience), proportional, and logarithmic. They found that the most difficult of these categories for students to grasp was the logarithmic scale, but the largest problem was connecting different levels of organization or timeframes.…”

Learning About Spatial and Temporal Scale: Current Research, Psychological Processes, and Classroom Implications

“…Even those who are able to construct log scales sometimes describe the linear scale representation as the real one and the log scale as a distortion (Swarat et al, 2011). …”

Conceptualizing astronomical scale: Virtual simulations on handheld tablet computers reverse misconceptions

“…The notion of scale is an excellent case in point (Swarat, Light, & Park, 2011;Tretter, Jones, Andre, Negishi, & Minogue, 2006). Consider that, for example, early in life learners establish an intuitive understanding that a tiny grain of sand (w1 mm) and a massive boulder (w1 m) can be related to one another through scale (of 1:10 3 ).…”