Companion to the 19th Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications 2004
DOI: 10.1145/1028664.1028745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A UML profile for service oriented architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In most of the current practice in separating functional and non-functional properties, non-functional properties are specified on a per-service basis (?, ? ; Amir & Zeid, 2004;Lodderstedt, Basin, & Doser, 2002;Jrjens, 2002;Nakamura, Tatsubori, Imamura, & Ono, 2005;Soler, Villarroel, Trujillo, Medina, & Piattini, 2006;Vokäc, 2005;Baligand & Monfort, 2004;G. Wang, Chen, Wang, Fung, & Uczekaj, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the current practice in separating functional and non-functional properties, non-functional properties are specified on a per-service basis (?, ? ; Amir & Zeid, 2004;Lodderstedt, Basin, & Doser, 2002;Jrjens, 2002;Nakamura, Tatsubori, Imamura, & Ono, 2005;Soler, Villarroel, Trujillo, Medina, & Piattini, 2006;Vokäc, 2005;Baligand & Monfort, 2004;G. Wang, Chen, Wang, Fung, & Uczekaj, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the current practices of separating functional and non-functional properties in SOA, non-functional properties are specified on a per-service basis [4][5][6][7][8][9]. However, with this per-service strategy, application developers need to manually ensure that each nonfunctional property is properly configured in a series of services in an ad-hoc manner because each non-functional property tends to cover multiple services simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of these UML-based approaches, we noticed the methods presented by Baresi et al [5,6] and AMir et al [7]. Baresi et al describe SO A by the static model and dynamic model in UML, then, encode the model into a transition system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However it is impossible to describe SOA sufficiently by the current popular UML-based approach [5][6][7] and BPEL [8,9] since UML is short of the support to describe some elements involved in software architecture and BPEL focuses on the specification of abstract or executive business processes but not on the description of functional units of system architecture. On the other hand, the existing ADLs (architecture definition languages) [10][11][12][13][14] cannot specify SOA very well in spite that we can benefit from the approaches based-on them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%