Dynamic Systems and Control, Volumes 1 and 2 2003
DOI: 10.1115/imece2003-42608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Unified Approach for Independent Manipulator Joint Acceleration Control and Observation

Abstract: The ultimate goal of a manipulator control design is to combine the design of both the controller and the observer into one procedural approach. Hence, the stability of the global system, namely, the manipulator dynamics, controller, and observer is guaranteed. This paper presents a new, unified approach in combining the control and observation problem for robotic manipulators. It links the design of an independent joint acceleration controller to the design of a variable structure state observer that is used … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3.13), Eq.(3.23). Application of Luenberger-style observers Canudas et al [64], El Beheiry [65], high-gain observers Khalil and Praly [66], Ball and Khalil [67], model-free observers De Luca et al [68], Hsiao and Weng [69] or a class of observers based on the slidingmode algorithms Davila et al [70] seems to be an efficient approach to reconstruct both q  and e  . Although all the aforementioned observers are able to reliably reconstruct manipulator state (both joint velocity and task space error velocity) based on position measurement q and task error e , there appears a difficulty to combine our control law and an observer from Canudas et al [64], El Beheiry et al [65], Khalil and Praly [66], Ball and Khalil [67], De Luca et al [68], Hsiao and Weng [69].…”
Section: Task Space Control Of the Redundant Robotic Manipulatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3.13), Eq.(3.23). Application of Luenberger-style observers Canudas et al [64], El Beheiry [65], high-gain observers Khalil and Praly [66], Ball and Khalil [67], model-free observers De Luca et al [68], Hsiao and Weng [69] or a class of observers based on the slidingmode algorithms Davila et al [70] seems to be an efficient approach to reconstruct both q  and e  . Although all the aforementioned observers are able to reliably reconstruct manipulator state (both joint velocity and task space error velocity) based on position measurement q and task error e , there appears a difficulty to combine our control law and an observer from Canudas et al [64], El Beheiry et al [65], Khalil and Praly [66], Ball and Khalil [67], De Luca et al [68], Hsiao and Weng [69].…”
Section: Task Space Control Of the Redundant Robotic Manipulatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although all the aforementioned observers are able to reliably reconstruct manipulator state (both joint velocity and acceleration) based on position measurement, there appears a difficulty to combine our control law and the observer from [60][61][62][63][64][65]. In order to make such combination possible, observers proposed in works [60][61][62][63][64][65] have to satisfy the so-called separation principle [68] which implies both the continuity of the controllers from [60][61][62][63][64][65] with the fully available state and asymptotic stability of the closed-loop system under the continuous state feed-back controllers. Let us observe that our control law (28) is discontinuous what prevents an application of the state observers from [60][61][62][63][64][65].…”
Section: (T)| β < |S I (T)| For |S I (T)| > 1 the Same Is Truementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to make such combination possible, observers proposed in works [60][61][62][63][64][65] have to satisfy the so-called separation principle [68] which implies both the continuity of the controllers from [60][61][62][63][64][65] with the fully available state and asymptotic stability of the closed-loop system under the continuous state feed-back controllers. Let us observe that our control law (28) is discontinuous what prevents an application of the state observers from [60][61][62][63][64][65]. Although the observer offered in [66] fulfils the separation principle, our controller handles unbounded uncertainties (in dynamics and disturbances) and does not require boundedness ofq andq, respectively.…”
Section: (T)| β < |S I (T)| For |S I (T)| > 1 the Same Is Truementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations