2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified approach for morphometric and functional data analysis in young, old, and demented adults using automated atlas-based head size normalization: reliability and validation against manual measurement of total intracranial volume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
998
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,171 publications
(1,008 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
9
998
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Typical registration targets for MRI (e.g., MNI152) are based on a young adult sample, which systematically introduces greater registration error among older adults (61). To avoid this issue, following the procedure outlined in Buckner et al (61), an adult-lifespan sample-representative template was created (see SI Appendix, Supplemental Experimental Procedures for details) to incorporate typical structural variation present across our healthy adult lifespan sample (n = 268; age range, 20-89 y). Standard fMRI preprocessing.…”
Section: Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical registration targets for MRI (e.g., MNI152) are based on a young adult sample, which systematically introduces greater registration error among older adults (61). To avoid this issue, following the procedure outlined in Buckner et al (61), an adult-lifespan sample-representative template was created (see SI Appendix, Supplemental Experimental Procedures for details) to incorporate typical structural variation present across our healthy adult lifespan sample (n = 268; age range, 20-89 y). Standard fMRI preprocessing.…”
Section: Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This entails registering the data for each subject to an atlas space, so that common imaging masks and fcMRI seeds can be used to define these nuisance signals in each subject. This transformation of the functional data to atlas space, in this case, 711-2B (Buckner et al, 2004;Talairach and Tournoux, 1988;Ojemann, 1997) was computed for each individual via the MP-RAGE scan. Each run then was resampled in atlas space (Talairach and Tournoux, 1988) on an isotropic grid (3 mm voxels) combining movement correction and atlas transformation in one interpolation (Lancaster et al, 1995;Snyder, 1996).…”
Section: Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology of FreeSurfer has been described in detail (Dale and Sereno, 1993;Dale et al, 1999;Fischl et al, 1999;Fischl and Dale, 2000;Fischl et al, 2001Fischl et al, , 2002Fischl et al, , 2004aSegonne et al, 2004;Desikan et al, 2006;Han et al, 2006;Jovicich et al, 2006;Segonne et al, 2007). Hippocampal measures were based on subcortical segmentation (Fischl et al, 2002(Fischl et al, , 2004aBuckner et al, 2004), and a neuroanatomically trained operator reviewed images for accuracy.…”
Section: Mri Acquisition and Postprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%