2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10013-019-00359-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Unified Characterization of Nonlinear Scalarizing Functionals in Optimization

Abstract: Over the years, several classes of scalarization techniques in optimization have been introduced and employed in deriving separation theorems, optimality conditions and algorithms. In this paper, we study the relationships between some of those classes in the sense of inclusion. We focus on three types of scalarizing functionals defined by Hiriart-Urruty, Drummond and Svaiter, Gerstewitz. We completely determine their relationships. In particular, it is shown that the class of the functionals by Gerstewitz is … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference is that, in Step 2, the authors use the well known Hiriart-Urruty functional and the support of a so called generator of the dual cone instead of ψ e , respectively. However, in in our framework, the functional ψ e is a particular case of those employed in the other methods, see [4,Corollary 2]. Thus, the equivalence in the case of vector optimization problems of the three algorithms is obtained.…”
Section: Algorithm 1 Descent Methods In Set Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The main difference is that, in Step 2, the authors use the well known Hiriart-Urruty functional and the support of a so called generator of the dual cone instead of ψ e , respectively. However, in in our framework, the functional ψ e is a particular case of those employed in the other methods, see [4,Corollary 2]. Thus, the equivalence in the case of vector optimization problems of the three algorithms is obtained.…”
Section: Algorithm 1 Descent Methods In Set Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…the functional ψ e is a particular case of those employed in the other methods, see [4,Corollary 2]. Thus, the equivalence in the case of vector optimization problems of the three algorithms is obtained.…”
Section: Algorithm 1 Descent Methods In Set Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Definition 3. 4 We say thatx is a stationary point of (SP ) if there exists a nonempty set Q ⊆ Px such that the following assertion holds:…”
Section: Theorem 31 Suppose Thatx Is a Local Weakly Minimal Solution Of (Sp ) Thenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we minimize here the well-known Tammer-Weidner-functional [11,14] which has many important properties, see for instance [17], and which turns out to be very useful in many theoretical and numerical approaches to multi-objective optimization. It is also the base of a very general scalarization in multiobjective optimization and covers several other scalarizations as special cases, see [5] and the recent review [1]. Let (t k+ , x k+ ) be a solution of (TW ).…”
Section: Basic Definitions and Algorithm Mhtmentioning
confidence: 99%