2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified framework for the construction of one-step finite volume and discontinuous Galerkin schemes on unstructured meshes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

18
661
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 572 publications
(680 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
18
661
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The scheme can almost reach third-and fifth-order accuracy by using the third-and fifth-order WENO reconstruction, respectively. As analyzed by Dumbser et al [57], B x and B y have opposite signs on the left and right and on the top and bottom boundary, respectively. Hence, there is a jump in the magnetic field at the boundaries due to the periodic boundary conditions.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Iso-density Mhd Vortex Advectionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The scheme can almost reach third-and fifth-order accuracy by using the third-and fifth-order WENO reconstruction, respectively. As analyzed by Dumbser et al [57], B x and B y have opposite signs on the left and right and on the top and bottom boundary, respectively. Hence, there is a jump in the magnetic field at the boundaries due to the periodic boundary conditions.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Iso-density Mhd Vortex Advectionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The 2D vortex advection problem proposed in [56] and lately considered by Dumbser et al [57] and Mignone at al. [58] is used to test the scheme's accuracy.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Iso-density Mhd Vortex Advectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(54) provides an explicit scheme which is stable under a CFL condition. The theoretical Courant number limits are CFL < 0.32 for a 2nd order scheme and, CFL < 0.17 for a 3rd order scheme, according to a linear stability analysis performed by Dumbser et al [16]. Such limits are in accordance with the usual ones for a DG scheme, depending on the degree of the polynomial representing the numerical solution.…”
Section: (45)mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The procedure requires successive analytical differentiations and it is rather cumbersome. In order to avoid the analytical calculations involved with it, a method based on local DG predictors was proposed by Dumbser et al [16] for the case of a SCL with non stiff source terms and by Dumbser et al [3] in the case of a SCL with stiff source terms. The method was then extended to nonconservative systems by Dumbser et al [1].…”
Section: Numerical Schemementioning
confidence: 99%