2022
DOI: 10.1126/science.abi8264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified genealogy of modern and ancient genomes

Abstract: The sequencing of modern and ancient genomes from around the world has revolutionized our understanding of human history and evolution. However, the problem of how best to characterize ancestral relationships from the totality of human genomic variation remains unsolved. Here, we address this challenge with nonparametric methods that enable us to infer a unified genealogy of modern and ancient humans. This compact representation of multiple datasets explores the challenges of missing and erroneous data and use… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
144
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 210 publications
2
144
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Relate does not use time discretization, and tsdate uses a discretization scheme where the time points are the quantiles of the lognormal prior distribution on node ages (Wohns et al . 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Relate does not use time discretization, and tsdate uses a discretization scheme where the time points are the quantiles of the lognormal prior distribution on node ages (Wohns et al . 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, inferring ARGs and sampling from their posterior distribution seemed like a nearly impossible endeavour some years ago, but important methodological developments now allow us to do so. Today, there are several methods available to estimate the full ARG or approximations of it, including ARGweaver (Rasmussen et al 2014), Relate (Speidel et al 2019) and tsinfer+tsdate (Kelleher et al 2019; Wohns et al 2021).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations