2014
DOI: 10.1080/00344893.2014.902216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Unified Scale of Electoral Incentives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These steps imply a set of design decisions for this study. First, I include the 63 MEPs who did not secure a place on their parties' list and set their re-election probabilities to zero (see footnote 9 in Stoffel, 2014: 60). Not placing a candidate on the party list can also be a candidate selection decision: maybe the most severe form of punishment by the party.…”
Section: Data and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These steps imply a set of design decisions for this study. First, I include the 63 MEPs who did not secure a place on their parties' list and set their re-election probabilities to zero (see footnote 9 in Stoffel, 2014: 60). Not placing a candidate on the party list can also be a candidate selection decision: maybe the most severe form of punishment by the party.…”
Section: Data and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as outlined above, a simple dichotomous distinction between list and PR candidates is not sufficient in the German case due to the huge number of dual candidates and the resulting contamination effects between the two electoral tiers. 6 Following Stoffel (2014a, 2014b) and Bernauer and Munzert (2014), I thus use the re-election probability of MPs in both tiers to measure their actual electoral incentive structure. This variable replaces the simple dichotomous distinction between district and list candidates with a continuous measurement, accounts for possible contaminations of the electoral tiers and indicates whether MPs should rather adhere to the incentives of the SMD or PR electoral system.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Re-election probabilities are calculated in a three-step process as described in Stoffel (2014b) and Stoffel and Sieberer (2018). 7 First, in order to determine the re-election safety in the district ( p D i ) , a probit model is calculated that uses the winning/losing margin at the election at time t – 1 to calculate the probability that an MP wins the district seat at the election at time t .…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations