Oceanic density overturns are commonly used to parameterize the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy. This method assumes a linear scaling between the Thorpe length scale L T and the Ozmidov length scale L O . Historic evidence supporting L T ; L O has been shown for relatively weak shear-driven turbulence of the thermocline; however, little support for the method exists in regions of turbulence driven by the convective collapse of topographically influenced overturns that are large by open-ocean standards. This study presents a direct comparison of L T and L O , using vertical profiles of temperature and microstructure shear collected in the Luzon Strait-a site characterized by topographically influenced overturns up to O(100) m in scale. The comparison is also done for open-ocean sites in the Brazil basin and North Atlantic where overturns are generally smaller and due to different processes. A key result is that L T /L O increases with overturn size in a fashion similar to that observed in numerical studies of Kelvin-Helmholtz (K-H) instabilities for all sites but is most clear in data from the Luzon Strait. Resultant bias in parameterized dissipation is mitigated by ensemble averaging; however, a positive bias appears when instantaneous observations are depth and time integrated. For a series of profiles taken during a spring tidal period in the Luzon Strait, the integrated value is nearly an order of magnitude larger than that based on the microstructure observations. Physical arguments supporting L T ; L O are revisited, and conceptual regimes explaining the relationship between L T /L O and a nondimensional overturn size c L T are proposed. In a companion paper, Scotti obtains similar conclusions from energetics arguments and simulations.