2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25011-8_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Unifying Property for Distribution-Sensitive Priority Queues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that our priority queue supports the stronger definition of the working-set and the queueish properties, in which the elements deleted are not accounted for in the time bounds. Our recent result about the asymptotic equivalence of the working-set bound and the unified bound [7] implies that our priority queue also satisfies the static-optimality, static-finger, and unified bounds. We defined the notion of time fingers, which encapsulates the working-set and the queueish properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is worth noting that our priority queue supports the stronger definition of the working-set and the queueish properties, in which the elements deleted are not accounted for in the time bounds. Our recent result about the asymptotic equivalence of the working-set bound and the unified bound [7] implies that our priority queue also satisfies the static-optimality, static-finger, and unified bounds. We defined the notion of time fingers, which encapsulates the working-set and the queueish properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Informally, the working-set property implies that the elements that have been recently operated on are faster to operate on compared to the elements that have not been accessed in the recent past. The unified bound [14] indicates an apparently, but not indeed [7], stronger property. The unified bound is the minimum per operation among the static-finger, static-optimality, and working-set bounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the notion of allowing the finger by which temporal distance is mea sured to be selected in advance is relatively new; prior to this thesis, this prob lem has only been studied in the context of priority queues. Elmasry et al [37] developed a priority queue that supports a constant number of temporal fingers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%