2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unifying theoretical and algorithmic framework for least squares methods of estimation in diffusion tensor imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
214
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
214
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Because diffusion tensor estimation techniques differ considerably in principle, speed, and accuracy, 29 awareness of the benefits and pitfalls is essential: the LLS method is fast and mostly used but assumes that errors are identically distributed, which can result in inaccurate estimation of the tensor. 30 The WLLS method is slightly slower but provides more accurate results because it considers errors to be heterogeneously distributed. 31 NLLS iteratively minimizes errors and results in more reliable estimation but needs considerably longer processing time and may get stuck in local optima during optimization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Because diffusion tensor estimation techniques differ considerably in principle, speed, and accuracy, 29 awareness of the benefits and pitfalls is essential: the LLS method is fast and mostly used but assumes that errors are identically distributed, which can result in inaccurate estimation of the tensor. 30 The WLLS method is slightly slower but provides more accurate results because it considers errors to be heterogeneously distributed. 31 NLLS iteratively minimizes errors and results in more reliable estimation but needs considerably longer processing time and may get stuck in local optima during optimization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lab-developed software written in Matlab (MathWorks, Natick, MA) was used to derive the diffusion tensors independently for each voxel from the diffusion-weighted images using a weighted linear least-squares method (Koay et al, 2006). The eigenvalue decomposition was then applied to each tensor, yielding a set of eigenvalues (l 1 !…”
Section: In-vivo Diffusion Tensor Imaging Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear leastsquares method is commonly used by vendors and is the default setting for commonly used DTI postprocessing software such as FSL (http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl) 55 ; however, this method proved to be the least appropriate to estimate the tensor because the method assumptions are restrictive and physically implausible. 56 Fig 3 shows the effect of the tensor estimation method for a dataset with few outliers and a dataset corrupted as the result of motion. The difference between the methods is clearly visible, with the ordinary least-squares method providing obviously erroneous results, whereas the weighted least-squares method, which only takes a fraction more computational time, provides more accurate results.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Tensormentioning
confidence: 99%